{"id":1799,"date":"2017-11-14T22:19:04","date_gmt":"2017-11-14T22:19:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=1799"},"modified":"2017-11-20T18:59:35","modified_gmt":"2017-11-20T18:59:35","slug":"the-bars-first-book-prize-2017-judges-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=1799","title":{"rendered":"The BARS First Book Prize 2017: Judges&#8217; Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This round, we had 19 nominations from publishers and BARS members, 12 from UK presses, the remainder from USA and Canada. As judges, we were really impressed by the high quality of the work submitted, which says a lot about the flourishing state of Romantic Studies. There was a lot of animated discussion and argument before the panel made its final decisions. Although it was hard work, we got a lot of pleasure from reading these books. Congratulations to all concerned, especially to the winner and runners up!<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Nigel Leask (Chair) (Glasgow); Nicola J. Watson (Open University); Anthony Mandal (Cardiff); Helen Stark (QMUL)<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3><strong>WINNER<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Julia S. Carlson, <em>Romantic Marks and Measures: Wordsworth\u2019s Poetry in Fields of Print<\/em> (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Julia-S.-Carlson-Romantic-Marks-and-Measures.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-1783 size-medium\" src=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Julia-S.-Carlson-Romantic-Marks-and-Measures-199x300.jpg\" alt=\"julia-s-carlson-romantic-marks-and-measures\" width=\"199\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Julia-S.-Carlson-Romantic-Marks-and-Measures-199x300.jpg 199w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Julia-S.-Carlson-Romantic-Marks-and-Measures-99x150.jpg 99w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Julia-S.-Carlson-Romantic-Marks-and-Measures.jpg 243w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 199px) 100vw, 199px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>Romantic Marks and Measures<\/em> is a rich and evocative work of scholarship, building on a variety of historical materials \u00ad\u00ad\u2013 maps, travel guides, elocutionary and prosodic studies, and literary works \u2013 to argue the case for a <em>cartopoetic<\/em> reading of Wordsworth\u2019s poetry and his adoption of blank verse as a turning point (in particular, in the <em>Lyrical Ballads<\/em>, <em>The Excursion<\/em> and <em>The Prelude<\/em>). As well offering a fresh reading of Wordsworth\u2019s punctuation, metrics and poetic revisions, both in print and manuscript, the book is also distinguished by its learned account of transformations in Romantic period cartography. Its two main sections are cleverly bridged by an interchapter that makes the case for a new perceptual turn grounded in marks and measures, which in turn is shown to be an informing presence in Wordsworth\u2019s poetics. A final chapter on Thelwall&#8217;s elocutionary work casts new light on his &#8216;therapoetics&#8217; and his critique of the &#8216;measure&#8217; of Wordsworth&#8217;s <em>Excursion<\/em>. This is an impressive debut and a strong contribution to interdisciplinary studies, displaying prosodic and interpretative rigour in reading Wordsworth\u2019s \u2018lines and points\u2019. As well as a major intervention in Wordsworth studies, <em>Romantic Marks and Measures<\/em> really has the potential to redefine our sense of &#8216;natural&#8217; representation, both in the field of topography, and in Romantic prosody and print culture.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3><strong>RUNNERS UP<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p><strong>Siobhan Carroll, <em>An Empire of Air and Water: Uncolonized Space in the British Imagination, 1750-1850<\/em> (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Siobhan-Carroll-An-Empire-of-Air-and-Water.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-558\" src=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Siobhan-Carroll-An-Empire-of-Air-and-Water-199x300.jpg\" alt=\"Siobhan Carroll - An Empire of Air and Water\" width=\"199\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Siobhan-Carroll-An-Empire-of-Air-and-Water-199x300.jpg 199w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Siobhan-Carroll-An-Empire-of-Air-and-Water.jpg 243w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 199px) 100vw, 199px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><em>An Empire of Air and Water<\/em> is a <em>tour de force<\/em>\u00a0of interdisciplinary excavation and remapping, which stakes new ground for the Romantic imaginary by drawing together a range of eclectic literary sources and putting them into dialogue with wider cultural projects during the Romantic Century. Carroll\u2019s book examines the presence of \u2018atopias\u2019 \u2013 spaces which resist categorisation, habitation and conceptualisation: these are polar regions, the oceans, the atmosphere and subterranean spaces. Each of the core chapters offers a nuanced and intriguing piece of a wider puzzle that collects around the British imperial project and its various technologies (as well as those of its competitors). These atopias function variously in extending the Romantic imagination upwards and outwards, while also resisting human endeavour through its evocation of a gothic past that always lurks beneath the surface. Carroll includes readings of numerous literary works, by Mary Shelley, Byron, Thomas De Quincey, Charles Dickens, Elizabeth Inchbald, Sophia Lee, and a number of lesser-known writers.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Devin Griffiths, <em>The Age of Analogy: Science and Literature Between the Darwins<\/em> (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins <span class=\"st\">University Press<\/span>, 2016). <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Devin-Griffiths-The-Age-of-Analogy.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1802\" src=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Devin-Griffiths-The-Age-of-Analogy-200x300.jpg\" alt=\"devin-griffiths-the-age-of-analogy\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Devin-Griffiths-The-Age-of-Analogy-200x300.jpg 200w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Devin-Griffiths-The-Age-of-Analogy-100x150.jpg 100w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/Devin-Griffiths-The-Age-of-Analogy.jpg 332w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Via a highly theorized discussion of analogy, Devin Griffiths seeks to place a new \u2018comparative historicism\u2019 at the heart of literary and scientific studies in the century between Erasmus Darwin and his grandson Charles.\u00a0 Although only about half of the book actually focuses on Romantic period writings, it makes renews our sense of the importance of Romantic narrative and methodological influences on Victorian literature and science. A theoretical introduction reviews the current state of literature and science studies, including a persuasive discussion of analogy in the work of Bruno Latour, Pierre Bourdieu and Alain Badiou. The main argument is set up via an illuminating study of the poetry of Erasmus Darwin, unduly neglected in Romantic Studies. A chapter on Walter Scott contains original research on \u2018popular antiquarianism\u2019 and ballad collecting, as well as reviewing the role of Scott&#8217;s novels in developing ideas of historical analogy in nineteenth-century literature. Two chapters are devoted to Tennyson and George Eliot, and a closing chapter on Charles Darwin (with a highly original focus on his Orchid book) identifies selective adaptation as a form of \u2018harmonious\u2019 analogy. Clearly written and full of critical flair, Griffiths&#8217; ambitious book harvests a decade&#8217;s worth of reading and scholarship, and will have a major impact on both Romantic and Victorian studies. It also reinvigorates our sense of the relationship between the &#8216;two cultures&#8217; of literature and science in the long nineteenth century.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This round, we had 19 nominations from publishers and BARS members, 12 from UK presses, the remainder from USA and Canada. As judges, we were really impressed by the high&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=1799\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1799"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1799"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1799\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1815,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1799\/revisions\/1815"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1799"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1799"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1799"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}