{"id":2157,"date":"2018-08-03T14:52:54","date_gmt":"2018-08-03T14:52:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=2157"},"modified":"2018-08-03T14:53:51","modified_gmt":"2018-08-03T14:53:51","slug":"report-from-romantic-novels-1818-susan-ferriers-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=2157","title":{"rendered":"Report from \u2018Romantic Novels 1818\u2019 &#8211; Susan Ferrier&#8217;s Marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"the_title\"><em>We present a report by Ruby Hawley-Sibbett from the latest \u2018<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/reading1817\">Romantic Novels 1818<\/a>&#8216; seminar which took place in July 2018. This series is sponsored by BARS and seminars are held at the University of Greenwich.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>You can see details of upcoming seminars in the series\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=1862\">here<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Seminar: Andy McInnes on \u2018The Death of the Authoress in Susan Ferrier\u2019s <em>Marriage<\/em>\u2019 by\u00a0Ruby Hawley-Sibbett<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/51fMKuZAt-L._SX317_BO1204203200_.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-2158\" src=\"http:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/51fMKuZAt-L._SX317_BO1204203200_-192x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"192\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/51fMKuZAt-L._SX317_BO1204203200_-192x300.jpg 192w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/51fMKuZAt-L._SX317_BO1204203200_-96x150.jpg 96w, https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/51fMKuZAt-L._SX317_BO1204203200_.jpg 319w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 192px) 100vw, 192px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Andy McInnes delivered a thought-provoking seminar which focused on suspicion towards female literary authority in Ferrier\u2019s first novel. McInnes began by considering how we read <em>Marriage <\/em>in 2018, including the minor revival of interest sparked by bicentenary events and the writer Val McDermid. McDermid\u2019s observation that while Scott considered Ferrier his &#8216;sister shadow&#8217;, she is now overshadowed by him, was juxtaposed with Leah Price\u2019s criticism of the use of Ferrier for national or gender balance in literary historical narratives. As well as Ferrier\u2019s status as a shadow of Scott and of Austen, McInnes also discussed her work as sharing qualities with Edgeworth\u2019s national tales.<\/p>\n<p>McInnes highlighted that <em>Marriage<\/em> features many potential author figures, but also that Ferrier appears suspicious of the term authoress, leading him to argue that Ferrier begins to marginalise the woman writer, thus undoing the work of the Scottish national tale. McInnes compared Juliet Shields\u2019 position in <em>From Family Roots to the Routes of Empire: National Tales and the Domestication of the Scottish Highlands<\/em> with that of Ian Duncan in <em>Scott\u2019s Shadow<\/em>, but he challenged their reading of hybridisation in Ferrier as a potential way of reconciling the British nation, suggesting this view is too idealised.<\/p>\n<p>Close reading of the passage relating to the authoress \u2018Mrs Blanque\u2019 in Bath, added by Ferrier to the 1841 text, led McInnes to argue that Ferrier was looking back at the situation of female authorship in 1818 and considering the vogue for anonymity, as an anonymous author herself. Alongside the \u2018Mrs Bluemitts\u2019 episode, this led McInnes to the conclusion that Ferrier was antagonistic to the public facing roles of authorship, applying Kowaleski-Wallace\u2019s idea of the \u2018scapegoating\u2019 of women. Introducing Barthian ideas, McInnes considered whether Ferrier\u2019s focus on reader relationships also demonstrates suspicion of authorship.<\/p>\n<p>This led to an engaging group discussion which covered national hybridity and potentially Utopian Britishness, suspicion of authorial power in other Romantic novels, and the ways in which our impatience with anonymity remains evident in 2018.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We present a report by Ruby Hawley-Sibbett from the latest \u2018Romantic Novels 1818&#8216; seminar which took place in July 2018. This series is sponsored by BARS and seminars are held&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=2157\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2157"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2157"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2157\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2161,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2157\/revisions\/2161"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2157"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2157"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2157"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}