{"id":6278,"date":"2026-01-22T16:18:15","date_gmt":"2026-01-22T16:18:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=6278"},"modified":"2026-01-22T16:30:04","modified_gmt":"2026-01-22T16:30:04","slug":"romantic-adaptations-situating-del-toros-frankenstein-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=6278","title":{"rendered":"Romantic Adaptations: Situating del Toro&#8217;s Frankenstein (2025)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><em>In this post, we welcome Dr Jodie Marley back to the BARS blog to discuss a handful of approaches to Guillermo del Toro&#8217;s recent adaptation of <\/em>Frankenstein<em>, starring Oscar Isaac, Jacob Elordi, and Mia Goth. If you would like to write for the &#8216;Romanticism Now&#8217; blog series, or any other series on the blog, please email Amy Wilcockson (comms officer) and Chloe Wilcox (comms fellow) at britishassociationromantic@gmail.com. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>(Contains spoilers for the 2025 <\/em>Frankenstein<em> film)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Guillermo del Toro\u2019s new <em>Frankenstein<\/em> adaptation received mixed reactions in my Romanticist circles. Rather than detail my personal response to the film, I hope to introduce several themes I\u2019ve observed in del Toro\u2019s adaptation process. This piece thus represents some initial ways to approach the film\u2019s engagement with Mary Shelley and her novel, and some starting points for further criticism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol type=\"1\"><li><strong><u>Guillermo del Toro\u2019s Oeuvre<\/u><\/strong><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>Perhaps the most telling key to Guillermo del Toro\u2019s new <em>Frankenstein<\/em> film is his self-identification with Mary Shelley, both detailing his own childhood trauma and describing William Godwin as a difficult father (Loughrey, \u2018How Guillermo del Toro\u2026\u2019). Many of del Toro\u2019s films focus on early-life trauma, adapted from his own lived experiences (Balanzategni 2015, 76-7). <em>Frankenstein <\/em>is characteristic of the director\u2019s past work, with Victor\u2019s turbulent upbringing by an abusive father (a departure from Shelley). Yet Victor\u2019s mother, in Shelley\u2019s and del Toro\u2019s versions, is a model for his relationships with women. Shelley\u2019s novel opens as Elizabeth takes on his mother\u2019s role looking after the Frankenstein family, and later, Victor dreams about kissing his dead mother\/Elizabeth, (2018, 27, 37).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Elizabeth, in the novel, only meets the Creature once (2018, 149). In del Toro\u2019s film, she represents a formative influence, alternately acting as a mentor figure and romantic interest. Elizabeth\u2019s relationship with the Creature in the film is truer to her relationship with Victor in the novel. This may be partly due to her engagement to Victor\u2019s brother in the 2025 adaptation. This is another source of familial tension absent from Shelley, which further isolates Victor in the film.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Elizabeth\u2019s romantic association with the Creature is never fully realised. She represents the latest in del Toro\u2019s tradition of pairing socially ostracised women with kind-hearted, though outwardly \u2018monstrous\u2019 men. <em>Frankenstein<\/em> often feels like a spiritual remake of del Toro\u2019s earlier <em>Shape of Water <\/em>(2017), where a mute cleaner, Elisa, falls for a water-tank-imprisoned amphibian man at a secret research facility. Elisa, like Elizabeth, teaches the man she cares for how to communicate. Both women are, ultimately, doomed by their relationships with monster-men. An early, less tragic example of this del Toro trope is the relationship between the eponymous demon Hellboy and telekinetic Liz in both the 2004 film and its 2008 sequel. In <em>Hellboy II<\/em>, Whale\u2019s <em>Bride of Frankenstein<\/em> (1935) plays on a background television during one of the couple\u2019s arguments (Ward 2014,12).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;Perhaps these women\u2019s similar names are coincidental. Del Toro\u2019s consistent reference to <em>Frankenstein<\/em> and its adaptations as inspiration for his films, however, is certain. Shaw details the impact of Whale\u2019s 1930s films on the director, who also required his <em>Cronos <\/em>(1993) crew to watch 1957\u2019s <em>Curse of Frankenstein<\/em> before shooting (Shaw 2013, 35-8). Considering the above context, 2025\u2019s <em>Frankenstein<\/em> may not be del Toro\u2019s first adaptation of Shelley\u2019s novel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong><u>Gender and Doubles<\/u><\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Doubling is prevalent in Shelley\u2019s novel. The Creature is a double of Victor, and Elizabeth is the double of Victor\u2019s mother. Del Toro expands the novel\u2019s feminine doubling, with Mia Goth assuming the roles of both Victor\u2019s mother and Elizabeth. Goth appears in facial prosthetics and a dark wig to \u2018double\u2019 Oscar Isaac, who plays her son.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Perhaps the most unexpected doubling of the 2025 adaptation is Elizabeth as a representation of Mary Shelley herself. Del Toro\u2019s film gives Elizabeth scientific interests, like Shelley (Groom 2018, xx; Smith 2016, 71). Shelley\u2019s early description of the character as a \u2018summer insect\u2019 becomes Elizabeth\u2019s interest in the study of insects (2018, 21). This is visually codified by beetle-shaped jewellery and a patterned green dress evoking a beetle exoskeleton on the front and the spinal nerve points on Frankenstein\u2019s galvanisation diagram at the back. The film\u2019s Scottish setting, which only appears briefly in the novel, has several significances for the period. It situates the film in the aftermath of the Scottish Enlightenment\u2019s scientific advancements in Edinburgh (Broadie and Smith 2019, 6). A gallows scene wherein Victor assesses the condemned\u2019s bodies for his project, evokes the city\u2019s trend of bodysnatching, and the grave-robbing of Edinburgh\u2019s Burke and Hare (Smith 2016,78-9). Finally, it recalls Shelley\u2019s time growing up in the country (2018, Appendix A [1831], 173).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Elizabeth, as Shelley\u2019s double, represents an idealised (and fictional) Romantic-era female polymath. She, as the Creature\u2019s true \u2018mother\u2019, doubles Shelley\u2019s pop cultural status as the \u2018mother\u2019 of science fiction and the Gothic, and thus of Frankenstein\u2019s reception history.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong><u>The Latin American Gothic<\/u><\/strong><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Whilst prevalent in contemporary literary and film studies, the Latin American Gothic has received less critical engagement in Romantic scholarship. One may, indeed, question the relevancy of this area of study to a film set in Europe like Shelley\u2019s novel. Yet to situate <em>Frankenstein <\/em>in its Latin American context as an adaptation by one of the most historically successful Mexican filmmakers, is to open a rich new critical context little explored to date in Romantic studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Shelley\u2019s novel references the colonisation of Mexico via Volney\u2019s <em>Ruins of Empires<\/em> (2018, 36, 87). <em>Frankenstein<\/em>, as a staple Gothic text, is referenced across Latin American Gothic criticism (2018, 97, 238; 2020; 5, 73-4, 112, 115). Another key study, <em>Tropical Gothic in Literature and Culture: The Americas<\/em>, opens with discussion of del Toro\u2019s <em>Cronos<\/em> (Edwards and Vasconcelos 2016, 1).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Del Toro is a proud Mexican filmmaker, who cast actors with Latin American roots for two of his three <em>Frankenstein<\/em> protagonists: Oscar Isaac (Cuban Guatemalan) and Mia Goth (Brazilian Canadian). Isaac explained del Toro\u2019s casting Latin American actors in main roles as a deliberate choice (Pappademas, \u2018How Oscar Isaac Made Frankenstein New Again\u2019). The political implications of the casting in 2025\u2019s US political context may be summarised with Isaac\u2019s statement on the film\u2019s production: \u2018immigrants, baby, we get the job done!\u2019 (Quoted in Lumba, \u2018Oscar Isaac Hail[s] Immigrants During Gotham Awards Acceptance Speech\u2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Del Toro\u2019s adaptation presents a Victor Frankenstein of colour building a (literally) stark-white Creature. This dynamic itself presents another doubling effect, mirroring the film\u2019s production: a Latin American process of rebuilding and retelling a European story. Del Toro stitches together the pieces of past Frankensteins, from Whale to <em>Hellboy<\/em>, to create an adaptation faithful to his own unique vision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Dr Jodie Marley<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Dr Jodie Marley (she\/her) is an early-career scholar and was recently a 2025 Visiting Research Fellow at the University of Glasgow. She publishes on Romantic receptions, national Romanticisms, the crossover of literature and the visual arts, spiritual cultures, and gender and sexuality. Her monograph&nbsp;<\/em>William Blake\u2019s Mysticism<em>&nbsp;was published by Palgrave in January 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><u>References<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Jessica Balanzategui, \u2018The Child Transformed by Monsters: The Monstrous Beauty of Childhood Trauma\u2019 in <em>The Supernatural Cinema of Guillermo del Toro<\/em>, ed. John W. Morehead (Jefferson: McFarland &amp; Company, 2015), 76-92.<\/li><li>Alexander Broadie and Craig Smith (eds.), <em>The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment<\/em>, Second Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).<\/li><li>Sandra Casanova-Vizca\u00edno and In\u00e9s Ordiz (eds), <em>Latin American Gothic in Literature and Culture <\/em>(New York: Routledge, 2018).<\/li><li>Justin D. Edwards and Sandra Guardini Vasconcelos (eds), <em>Tropical Gothic in Literature and Culture: The Americas<\/em> (New York: Routledge, 2016).<\/li><li>Antonio Alcal\u00e1 Gonz\u00e1lez and Ilse Bussing L\u00f3pez (eds), <em>Doubles and Hybrids in Latin American Gothic<\/em> (New York: Routledge, 2020).<\/li><li>Clarice Loughrey, \u2018How Guillermo del Toro, Oscar Isaac and Jacob Elordi made the horror movie of the year\u2019, <em>The Independent<\/em>, 4<sup>th<\/sup> November 2025 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/arts-entertainment\/films\/features\/frankenstein-netflix-interview-jacob-elordi-b2857243.html?lid=slvt6yftj4mw\">https:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/arts-entertainment\/films\/features\/frankenstein-netflix-interview-jacob-elordi-b2857243.html?lid=slvt6yftj4mw<\/a><\/li><li>Frederick Marvin Lumba, \u2018Oscar Isaac Hail[s] Immigrants During Gotham Awards Acceptance Speech: \u201cWe Get the Job Done\u201d\u2019, <em>International Business Times<\/em>, 2<sup>nd<\/sup> December 2025 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ibtimes.co.uk\/isaac-guatemalan-one-many-immigrants-working-hollywood-1759624\">https:\/\/www.ibtimes.co.uk\/isaac-guatemalan-one-many-immigrants-working-hollywood-1759624<\/a><em><\/em><\/li><li>Alex Pappademas, \u2018How Oscar Isaac Made <em>Frankenstein<\/em> New Again\u2019, <em>GQ<\/em>, 10<sup>th<\/sup> November 2025 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gq.com\/story\/oscar-isaac-gq-cover-story-interview-men-of-the-year-2025\">https:\/\/www.gq.com\/story\/oscar-isaac-gq-cover-story-interview-men-of-the-year-2025<\/a><em><\/em><\/li><li>Deborah Shaw, <em>The Three Amigos: The Transnational Filmmaking of Guillermo Del Toro, Alejandro Gonz\u00e1lez I\u00f1\u00e1rritu, and Alfonso Cuar\u00f3n <\/em>(Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013).<\/li><li>Mary Shelley, <em>Frankenstein: The 1818 Text<\/em>, ed. Nick Groom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).<\/li><li>Andrew Smith (ed.), <em>The Cambridge Companion to Frankenstein<\/em> (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).<\/li><li>Glenn Ward, \u2018\u201cThere Is No Such Thing\u201d: Del Toro\u2019s Metafictional Monster Rally\u2019 in <em>The Transnational Fantasies of Guillermo del Toro<\/em>, ed. Davies et al (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014), 11-28.<\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this post, we welcome Dr Jodie Marley back to the BARS blog to discuss a handful of approaches to Guillermo del Toro&#8217;s recent adaptation of Frankenstein, starring Oscar Isaac,&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/?p=6278\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"pagelayer_contact_templates":[],"_pagelayer_content":""},"categories":[23,45],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6278"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6278"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6278\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6282,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6278\/revisions\/6282"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bars.ac.uk\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}