Role Advertisements: BARS PGR and ECR Representatives 2024–2026

Supporting Postgraduates and Early Career Researchers has always been an important part of the remit of the British Association for Romantic Studies. We are currently inviting applications for appointment to the roles of Postgraduate Representative and Early Career Representative for BARS to cover, in the first instance, the next two years from summer 2024.

BARS Postgraduate Representatives

We are currently looking for a postgraduate student willing to join the Executive in order to represent our Postgraduate members and students in the field more generally.

Duties and Responsibilities of the Role:

During their term, the Postgraduate Representative will attend approximately four Executive meetings (typically online) and have the opportunity to co-organise postgraduate events. They will also work with the Early Career Representative to organise the next biennial Postgraduate and Early Career Researcher Conference, due to be held in 2025 and announced later this year.

The position offers valuable experience in conference organisation, logistics and communications, as well as excellent networking opportunities. Importantly, it provides the chance to help shape the Romantic studies community by feeding in to the Executive’s discussions and launching new initiatives to support postgraduates in the field. Past Postgraduate Reps have been instrumental in the launch of the BARS Digital Events series and co-editing special journal issues arising from the PGR/ECR conferences.

The Postgraduate Representative will serve for an initial term of two years: after this, there is the opportunity to apply to renew their position, according to their status of their studies or to apply for the role of Early Career Representative. Please note that BARS is offering a stipend of £750 per annum for this role; also, any travel expenses incurred for attending BARS Executive business onsite will be met by the Association.

Eligibility:

We are especially keen to receive applications from students who expect to have postgraduate status until the summer of 2026, although this is not required.

How to Apply:

Please send expressions of interest, together with a two-page CV including a brief description of your research, to the Secretary of the Association, Andrew McInnes, copying in the President, Anthony Mandal. The deadline for expressions of interest is midnight, 3 June 2024.

Expressions of interest should be up to 500 words in length, and should be accompanied by an up-to-date CV (of no more than two pages). We encourage applicants to discuss their experience, skills, and passion for the role in their expression of interest, and we would very much like to read of proposals applicants have for the location, topic and logistics of the next BARS PGR/ECR conference in 2025.

Depending on circumstances and context, the appointing panel will have discretion to propose up to two Postgraduate Representatives to the BARS Executive Committee, as has been the case in recent years.

If you would like to discuss the position further, please feel free to get in touch with:

Cleo O’Callaghan Yeoman (current Postgraduate Representative) cleo.o.callaghan.yeoman@stir.ac.uk

Yu-Hung Tien (current Postgraduate Representative) yuhung.tien@ed.ac.uk

Andrew McInnes (BARS Secretary) bars.secretary@gmail.com

Anthony Mandal (BARS President) – mandal@cardiff.ac.uk

BARS ECR Representative

Alongside the BARS Postgraduate Representative, we are also looking to appoint an Early Career Researcher willing to join the Executive in order to represent our early career members and early career researchers in the field more generally.

Duties and Responsibilities of the Role:

During their term, the Early Career Representative will attend approximately four Executive meetings and have the opportunity to co-organise events that benefit the postgraduate and early career community. They will also work with the Postgraduate Representative(s) to organise the next biennial Early Career and Postgraduate Conference, due to be held in 2025 and announced later this year.

The position offers valuable experience in peer mentoring, conference organisation, logistics and communications, and offers excellent networking opportunities. Importantly, it provides the chance to help shape the Romantic Studies Early Career and Postgraduate community by feeding into the Executive’s discussions and launching new initiatives to support early career researchers in the field. Past Early Career Representatives have been instrumental in the launch of the BARS Digital Events series and co-editing special journal issues arising from the PGR/ECR conferences.

The Early Career Representative is also responsible for facilitating the Nineteenth-Century Matters Fellowship together with the British Association for Victorian Studies (BAVS) Postdoctoral Representative. The Nineteenth-Century Matters Fellowship is an annual initiative jointly run by BARS and BAVS to offer unaffiliated early career researchers a platform from which to organise professionalization workshops and research seminars on a theme related to nineteenth-century studies, relevant to the agreed host institution’s specialisms.

The Early Career Representative will serve for a term of two years. After this, there is the opportunity to apply to renew their position according to their eligibility. Please note that BARS is offering a stipend of £750 per annum for this role; also, any travel expenses incurred for attending BARS Executive business onsite will be met by the Association.

Eligibility:

The Early Career Representative must be an early career researcher based in the UK. The Early Career Representative will mentor the Postgraduate Representative and together they will organise the BARS PGR/ECR Conference to be held in 2025, and the Early Career Representative will work with the BAVS Postdoctoral Representative to run the Nineteenth-Century Matters Fellowship on an annual basis. Therefore, demonstrable in-person conference organisation experience is essential. Excellent team working skills and communication skills must be evidenced. Prior mentoring experience is desirable.

How to Apply:

Please send expressions of interest, together with a two-page CV including a brief description of your research, to the Secretary of the Association, Andrew McInnes, copying in the President, Anthony Mandal. The deadline for expressions of interest is midnight, 3 June 2024.

Expressions of interest should be up to 500 words in length, and should be accompanied by an up-to-date CV (of no more than two pages). We encourage applicants to discuss their experience, skills, and passion for the role in their expression of interest, and we would very much like to read of proposals applicants have for the location, topic and logistics of the next BARS PGR/ECR conference in 2025.

If you would like to discuss the position further, please feel free to get in touch with:

Amanda Blake Davis (current Early Career Representative) a.davis2@derby.ac.uk

Andrew McInnes (BARS Secretary) bars.secretary@gmail.com

Anthony Mandal (BARS President) – mandal@cardiff.ac.uk

Poetry and Mindfulness: BARS/Wordsworth Trust Report – Rebecca Ferrier

Rebecca Ferrier is one of 2023/2024’s BARS/Wordsworth Trust Fellowship recipients. Rebecca spent a few weeks in Grasmere working with the Wordsworth Trust and the wonderful staff there. In this blog post, we hear about Rebecca’s time in the Lake District!

My time in Grasmere as a BARS/Wordsworth Trust fellow was greatly rewarding. In regards to my PhD work, I found materials at the Trust which fed into my thesis and early manuscript draft, which I wrote a partial introduction to at the Jerwood Centre. As I am working towards a Creative Writing PhD, I found time for creative output, with two draft poems centred around Dorothy Wordsworth’s domestic life, and another draft erasure poem about her brother, John, using one of William Wordsworth’s ecclesiastical sonnets. From sitting in on a presentation with curator Melissa Mitchell, to hearing about Jessica Sneddon’s poetry activities in the café, there was much to enrich the soul and inspire both academic and creative work. 

I enjoyed delving further into Wordsworth’s influences, especially in regard to early Christian history. I also began drafting a paper concerning the reinterpretation of one particular ecclesiastical-inspired poem by Wordsworth, which I hope to complete this year. Without my time at the Wordsworth Trust, I would not have accessed this information and been able to develop this particular approach.  

During the Fellowship, I also found a need to reframe my own ideas around archival research and presenting ideas to a different audience. As a novelist, I predominantly consider a readership audience. While talking to Jeff and the team at the Wordsworth Trust, spending ample time in the museum and hearing about everyone’s interests, I began to understand how a museum seeks to capture their visitors’ attentions, about the responsibilities of curation and how to engage a different type of audience than I’m familiar with. 

While I explored the Romantics and mindfulness, as linked to the pilgrim themes within my PhD, I uncovered my own personal revelations. Although I have always been a walker, lately I had seen walking only in regards to the steps I could meet, the pace I could reach and the time it took. In seeking to hit target after target, I had forgotten the joy of walking for walking’s sake, too stuck in familiar routines and ticking an item off a check-list or meeting my phone tracker’s ‘point’ goal. During my time in the Lakes, I rediscovered what my own pace was, met my body at its softer limits and surprised myself with what I could do when I gave myself the time to do it. I also made new friends, poetry connections and a firm desire to visit again what truly is ‘the loveliest spot that man hath ever found’. 

Biography: Rebecca Ferrier’s lyrical debut novel The Salt Bind is due for publication by Renegade, Dialogue Books, in 2025. She is pursuing a Creative Writing PhD at Northumbria University, having been awarded a fully-funded studentship. She was the recipient of a Bridge Award for an Emerging Writer in 2020 and has previously benefited from Creative Scotland funding. She was shortlisted for the international Alpine Fellowship Poetry Prize in 2023 and 2024. Her short prose can be found with Extra Teeth and New Gothic Review, while her poetry has been featured by The Friday Poem, Canthius and Poetry Ireland Review. She is a member of the RSE-funded DeathWrites network with Glasgow University. She is represented by Alex Cochran at C&W, part of The Curtis Brown Group.  

Summer School: AIA – Italian Association for the Study of English – Place, Space, and Identity in the Anglophone World: Linguistic, Literary, and Cultural Insights

AIA – Italian Association for the Study of English

SUMMER SCHOOL 2024

Place, Space, and Identity in the Anglophone World: 

Linguistic, Literary, and Cultural Insights
Università degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, Italy

 9-12 July 2024

The AIA 2024 Summer School, Place, Space, and Identity in the Anglophone World: Linguistic, Literary, and Cultural Insights, aims to bring together students and early-career researchers and develop knowledge, methodologies, and new perspectives on the complex relationship between space, place, and identity. The evolving global scenario calls for a redefinition of temporal and spatial dimensions in terms of cosmopolitan, transnational, and transcultural practices. These, in turn, contribute to shaping new identities that are characterized by evolution and fluidity. People negotiate their relationships with the environments and the communities inscribing their identities onto physical spaces imbued with power dynamics, socio-economic factors, and cultural memory. 

Within this framework, the summer school intends to develop relevant theoretical approaches to investigate identity construction at the intersection of linguistic, literary, and cultural studies. The aim is to provide a forum to explore the multifaceted dialogue between space, place, and identity, and their mutual influences.

Lectures and seminars will explore how:

• language engages with the pragmatic and discursive construction of space-place relationships in transnational contexts and their identitarian implications;

• literature delves into the complexities of individual experience and amplifies marginalized voices, shedding light on the intersection of identity construction and categorization;

• the agency of individuals and communities negotiates identities within spatial environments, navigating between belonging and exclusion, rootedness and mobility.

REGISTRATION DEADLINE: 20 June 2024

For more information, head to www.anglistica.it/2024/04/19/aia-summer-school-2024/ or email aiasummerschool@unich.it.

Call for Papers: The Global Jane Austen: Celebrating and Commemorating 250 years of Jane Austen

University of Southampton, July 10-12, 2025

Austen scholars and enthusiasts are invited to the University of Southampton, Hampshire, for a conference commemorating Austen’s birth in the year 1775. 

In 1976, Juliet McMaster introduced an edited collection of essays resulting from a bicentenary birthday celebration for Austen in the following terms: 

To celebrate the two-hundredth anniversary of Jane Austen’s birth in October, in Western Canada, is no doubt to be guilty of a comic incongruity. But as though to compensate for the misdemeanor, the papers delivered at the conference have a common and exact focus on period and locale. 

50 years after the bicentenary conference at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, the scholarly landscape of Austen studies has changed. Where many monographs and edited collections of essays still maintain an ‘exact focus on period and locale’, research informed by book history, the material, archival and linguistic turns in literary criticism, postcolonial studies and adaptation theory (among others) has flourished in the intervening decades. The ever-expanding corpus of adaptations, sequels and prequels has proven fruitful territory for a consideration of Austen’s reception, in its broadest sense. Austen’s transformations into other languages and into other cultures make her a Global author. 

We invite the international community to the port city that was Jane Austen’s home from 1806-1809 for a consideration of the Global Jane Austen. We encourage the broadest possible interpretation of the conference theme, and welcome papers on all aspects of Austen’s writing and life, her posthumous reception, her influences, and her writing alongside that of her contemporaries. We particularly welcome papers on adaptations, translations and creative responses to Austen’s work (written and/or performed in all languages), material and textual transmission of her works, and her reception and reputation in countries outside the Anglophone world. Discussion of the Global within her works (and those of her contemporaries) is equally acceptable. 

Submission

Please submit abstracts for individual papers of 250 words, or proposals for 3-person panels of 1000 words, to the conference organisers, Gillian Dow and Katie Halsey. Please submit as Word or PDF documents by email to both G.Dow@soton.ac.uk and katherine.halsey@stir.ac.uk by 1 October 2024.

Confirmed Speakers Include:

Susan Allen Ford; Serena Baiesi, Janine Barchas; Jennie Batchelor; Annika Bautz; Isabelle Bour; Joe Bray; Linda Bree; Inger Brody; Valérie Cossy; Richard Cronin; Carlotta Farese; Susannah Fullerton; Sayre Greenfield; Isobel Grundy; Christine Kenyon Jones; Freya Johnston; Michael Kramp; Devoney Looser; Deidre Lynch; Anthony Mandal; Juliet McMaster; Marie Nedregotten Sørbø; Peter Sabor; Diego Saglia; Rebecca Smith; Jane Stabler; Kathryn Sutherland; Bharat Tandon; Janet Todd; Anne Toner; Linda Troost; Juliette Wells.

Call for Papers: Hybridity and Women’s Writing in Eighteenth-century Britain

Guest Editors: Francesca Blanch-Serrat, Paula Yurss Lasanta

In the last four decades, hybridity has become an umbrella term encompassing a variety of disciplines, including biology, linguistics, postcolonial studies, media studies, and cultural studies. Particularly within literary studies, genre hybridity refers to the blending of themes, forms, and other elements from different genres—a practice with a long and fruitful history as old as literature itself. As a hybrid field itself, literature cannot be extricated from “extraneous elements”such as the sociopolitical context, class, age, or gender. According to Behling’s formulation2, the hybrid genre exists as a site for identity negotiation and resistance. In this sense, the hybrid genre allows for the assertion, reconsideration, and articulation of women’s identities. In women’s writing, it becomes a strategy and a vehicle for intellectual contemplation and expression. 

Indebted to the hybridity of genre in the early modern period, the eighteenth century saw a blossoming of hybrid texts fostered by new forms of circulation and the growing literary market. Authors “experimented with hybrid combinations to a degree previously unrecognized”3, and women writers in particular, often excluded from intellectual debates because of their gender, not only experimented with blending different genres but also challenged conventional notions of authorship and literary authority to navigate the constraints imposed on them. Examples of hybridity can be found in the blending of biography and fiction in Romantic novels by Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Hays, Mary Robinson, and Mary Shelley4, as well as in genres such as the travelogue, the sentimental periodical, the agricultural tour, the cookery book, or the memoir, and other examples of life writing. 

By examining eighteenth-century women’s writing through the lens of hybridity, Hybridity and Women’s Writing in Eighteenth-Century Britain seeks to illuminate new pathways for understanding and appreciating the complexities of women’s literary production during this era. 

Located in the intersections of gender, genre, and hybridity, the editors of this volume seek contributions that explore the various ways in which women writers asserted, reconsidered, and articulated their literary identities within the socio-cultural milieu of the eighteenth century through hybrid texts. Special attention will be given to lesser-known case studies and we extend our invitation to submissions that engage with a wide range of hybrid genres, including but not limited to the novel, 

autobiography, periodical essay, travelogue and poetic forms. We welcome interdisciplinary approaches that enrich our understanding of literary studies, such as history, philosophy and other relevant disciplines. 

Topics of interest may include, but are not limited to: 

• Life writing across genres. 

• Hybrid identities: queer identities, ethnicity, interfaith relations, women and the empire, etc. 

• Hybrid genres: the agricultural tour, the travelogue, etc. 

• Women’s literary authority and the hybrid form. 

• Genre hybridity in women’s scientific writing: botany, astronomy…

• Memory and narrative truth (Intersection between fact and fiction).

• Genre and political discourse (The political function of literary genres).

• Cultural purity and hybridity in historical contexts. 

Proposals for articles (in the form of an abstract of about 250 words) must be submitted before 30 June 2024. The selected proposals will be announced by late July. Please submit your proposals to: Francesca.Blanch@uab.cat and Paula.Yurss@uab.cat

Completed articles with a maximum length of 8,000 words, including footnotes, must be submitted by November 31, 2024. Articles will include a short biography, an abstract (80-130 words) and 5–10 keywords. Contributors should follow the Brepols Guidelines for Authors. Papers will be published in Hybridity and Women’s Writing in Eighteenth-century Britain (Autumn 2025), as part of the book series Early Modern Women Writers in Europe: Texts, Debates, and Genealogies of Knowledge, published by Brepols Publishers. Please note that the essay submission date and publication schedule are tentative and subject to change, depending on the peer reviewing progress.

Saïd, Edward. “Figures, Configurations, Transfigurations.” From Commonwealth to Post-Colonial. Ed. Anna Rutherford. Dangaroo, 1992: 15.

Behling, Laura L. “‘Generic’ Multiculturalism: Hybrid Texts, Cultural Contexts.” College English, vol. 65, no. 4, 2003: 415. 

3 Ingrassia, Catherine. “Introduction.” The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789. Ed. Catherine Ingrassia. Cambridge University Press, 2015: 12. 

Cook, Daniel, and Amy Culley. Women’s Life Writing, 1700-1850: Gender, Genre and Authorship. Palgrave Macmillan, 2016: 5. 

On This Day: Claire Clairmont’s Birthday – Thoughts on the Education of Stepdaughters

27 April marks the alleged birthday of Claire Clairmont, best known for her liaison with Lord Byron! In this #OnThisDay post, Selina Packard discusses Clairmont and education.

A birthday is a convenient hook on which to hang a reflection on a significant figure, as this and other ‘On This Day’ projects evince. But it can also be of interest itself: no birth certificate or registration has been found for Claire Clairmont, and the mystery of her paternity – kept secret by her mother her whole life – has only been resolved this century.[1] For this reason, and its poetic coincidence with Mary Wollstonecraft’s birthday, it has been speculated that that she adopted the date as a tribute to the revered thinker.[2]

Claire Clairmont. Portrait now held at Newstead Abbey, Nottinghamshire. Public Domain

Much has been written – understandably – about the relationship between Wollstonecraft and her daughter Mary Godwin, later Shelley. But less well-noted is that between Mary’s stepsister, Claire Clairmont and her lost stepmother. For the young Clairmont, Wollstonecraft’s Letters Written during a Short Residence in Sweden, Norway and Denmark (1796) was one of her favourite books. She described it idiosyncratically as ‘altogether a beautiful poem,’ when Shelley read it aloud during their harum-scarum 1814 tour of the continent.[3] But when she was older, forced by circumstance to become a governess, Clairmont also came to share Wollstonecraft’s interest in pedagogy.

In keeping with the revolutionary times, when education was seen by contemporary thinkers as key to social and political change, Wollstonecraft wrote variously on the topic, from her first book – the disappointingly unrevolutionary Thoughts on the Education of Daughters (1787) – to the more developed views expounded in the second Vindication (1792). A central component of her argument in that work concerned the establishment of a national system of education based on reason, in which children ‘should be excited to think for themselves.’[4] Wollstonecraft decried a system in which ‘time is lost in teaching [children] to recite what they do not understand […] whilst seated on benches, all in their best array, the mammas listen in astonishment to the parrot-like prattle.’[5] Most importantly, girls should be taught alongside the boys, instead of the current regime in which, instead of being permitted to run freely ‘as nature directs to complete her own design’, girls are ‘obliged to pace with steady deportment stupidly backwards and forwards, holding up their heads and turning out their toes.’[6]

Clairmont was a teacher from her twenties to her early forties. She was a governess in Russia in the aftermath of Shelley’s death, then in Italy with an English family, before ending up back in London, looking after her ailing mother while working a punishing schedule. At the beginning of her career, at least, she had the time and inclination to reflect on her practice, which she did in several long letters from Russia.

She worked alongside the male tutor of the household (Herman Gambs, a German who fell quite in love with her) and had the opportunity to observe the differences in education for girls and boys from the point of view of an educator. ‘A tutor is ten thousand times happier than a governess,’ she reflected, ‘because boys may jump and play, but girls must always be in a perpetual state of etiquette, which constraint spoils their disposition, by forcing it from its natural channel into a narrow space.’ [7]

As did Wollstonecraft in her clashes with Lady Kingsborough during her own stint as a governess in Ireland in 1786, Clairmont often found herself at odds with her Russian employers, who had a quite different idea of education. They make, she wrote, ‘the external work upon the internal, which is, in fact, nothing but an education fit for monkies, and is a mere system of imitation.’ Whereas she wanted, ‘the internal to work upon the external; that is to say, that my pupil should be left at liberty as much as possible, and that her own reason should be the prompter of her actions’.[8] Clairmont in her views on education shows herself – even if self-consciously – the inheritor of Wollstonecraft’s thinking.

But both women were ambivalent about their teaching careers. In 1787 when Wollstonecraft returned from Ireland, she grasped the opportunity offered by the publisher Joseph Johnson to write for a living. Similarly, by the time Clairmont was in London in her early forties, slogging through a twelve-hour day involving a four-hour commute on the ‘vile omnibus,’[9] she was heartily sick of her profession. Following her mother’s death in 1841 Clairmont negotiated an income from the Shelley estate and stopped teaching for good.

We only have a few isolated years of Clairmont’s journals. She mentioned her birthday directly in two years – 1820 and 1821 – remarking briefly ‘Birthday’ and her age. There are entries for April 27th in preceding years that make no mention of a birthday. She famously once wrote of her talented family, ‘if you cannot write an epic poem or a novel that by its originality knocks all other novels on the head, you are a despicable creature not worth acknowledging.’ [10] Perhaps amongst this intimidating milieu her invented birthday was a talismanic way of connecting herself to a worthy heritage. Clairmont after all had a symbolic, not to say superstitious, imagination.

Whatever the case – real or invented – Clairmont’s shared birthday with the stepmother she never knew, established a chain of connection she carried with her throughout her life, living a long independent existence into old age, living the life – at least in some respects – the previous generation had been unable to.

Selina Packard


Selina Packard is an archivist currently working on ‘Mapping Heritage’, a pilot project for the Open University exploring the relationship between places and ideas in the intellectual milieu of early nineteenth-century London. She has a PhD from Goldsmiths College on Mary Shelley’s fictional personae.

https://www.open.edu/openlearn/languages/english-language/commemorating-lord-byron-on-the-streets-london

[1] Claire Clairmont, Mary Jane’s Daughter: New Correspondence with Claire’s Father (google.com)

[2] William St Clair, The Godwins and The Shelleys (London: Faber, 1989), p. 250

[3] The Journals of Claire Clairmont ed by Marion Kingston Stocking (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968), p. 33

[4] Wollstonecraft, Mary, Vindication of the Rights of Woman; Vindication of the Rights of Men

(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008), p. 241

[5] Ibid, p. 247

[6] Ibid, p. 248

[7] The Clairmont Correspondence ed by Marion Kingston Stocking (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), p. 215

[8] Ibid, p. 215

[9] Ibid, p. 355

[10] Ibid, p. 295

CFP: Alternative Approaches to Health in the Long-Eighteenth Century

In his multi-volume Hygëia; Or, Essays Moral and Medical (1802), Thomas Beddoes notes the paradox that “no one knows the value of health, till it is lost” (Vol. I, Essay I, p. 83). Stretching from the 1665 outbreak of the plague through the 1850 cholera epidemic, the “long” eighteenth century witnesses an extraordinary debate over the attainment, preservation, and the very meaning of health through competing discourses and practices that give shape and influence the development of medicine, history, literature, politics, and culture well into the nineteenth century. From the perspective of health and medicine post “germ theory,” this period functions as a gateway for “thinking differently about the individual subject, health, and nature.” Indeed, even before the development of germ theory, the different understandings of disease effectively functioned as “alternative or complimentary, rather than contradictory,” since their definitions were continuously in flux1. This difference allows scholarship to chart the coexistence of multiple medical and social models of caring for the body, or even what counts as ‘health’ or ‘medicine.’ From debates between Brunonian, Hunterian, and Boerhavian conceptions of the body to indigenous and non-western practices, we invite scholarly essays that contest and complicate our understanding of the meanings, representations, and practices of health and/or medicine in the period. 

This collection seeks proposals for 5,000-6,000 word essays that explore alternative conceptions, practices, and approaches to health in the long-eighteenth century. We expect that these essays will be accessible to a wide range of scholars from different disciplines and hope that they will be written in a way that makes them available to advanced undergraduate readers. 

We particularly invite essays that explore: 

● Indigenous and non-western traditions of health and healing 

● Home remedies and homeopathy 

● Prosthetics and other technological developments for atypical bodies ● Intersections of race, imperial networks, and health 

● Literary renegotiations of health, illness, and care 

Please submit 300-400 word abstracts to Matthew L. Reznicek (reznicek@umn.edu) and Miriam Wallace (mwall29@uis.edu) by 17 May 2024. We will aim for the submission of 5,000-6,000 word essays in the Spring of 2025.

“Writing like Wordsworth”: A Brief Primer

We are thrilled to welcome to the blog Dr Adam Neikirk, one of the BARS/Wordsworth Grasmere Early Career Fellows. His blog post below discusses his ongoing project “Writing like Wordsworth”, detailing his plans to work with Wordsworth Grasmere on encouraging Wordsworthian creativity!

What is “Writing like Wordsworth”?

Earlier this year I was chosen to be a BARS/Wordsworth Grasmere Early Career Fellow for 2024/2025. This fellowship is a dream come true for me: an American who fell in love with the Lake District while studying for my doctorate in England, I now have a perfectly valid reason to spend an entire month at the Wordsworth Foundation’s beautiful Grasmere location, which is centered around Dove Cottage, Wordsworth’s former domicile. While I am on-site, I will be writing and thinking about poems and how to teach poetry: not just how to read it, but how to conceive of and write it; as I believe this is an important skill that is in danger of becoming lost. I hope to teach writing and present workshops on writing while I am there, and to work together with the site’s staff and outreach teams. I am so thankful to both BARS and the Wordsworth Foundation for selecting me and my project, which is entitled “Writing like Wordsworth.”

“Writing like Wordsworth” is the name of a poetry-based teaching project designed to encourage participants to pursue their own Wordsworthian creativity, whether that be in the penning of a single sonnet or the authoring of an updated Lyrical Ballads for the 2020s. This project is based on my own experiences as a poet who has studied the British Romantics, especially Wordsworth and Coleridge; and who also has frequently been inclined to try to write like them. I believe my readers (what few of them there are) may often have had that experience that Wordsworth describes in the preface to Lyrical Ballads: looking round with feelings of strangeness and awkwardness for what they consider poetry to be, and wondering where it might have gone. Why write in a way that obscures your identity, or that feels so alien from where we are now? Isn’t the point of a poet to be someone who has their finger on the pulse of society right now?

Some academics have likewise asked me to explain in critical terms why I write in an “antiquated” style that is “clearly not modern English,” without considering the ironic fact that, to most non-academics used to texting (and sometimes thinking) abbreviated phrases like “lol” and “omg”, much academic writing would also strike them as curiously out of step with their sense of what contemporary “writing” is really like—although it (academic writing) makes a parsimonious sort of sense to those of us who continuously engage in it, and that is one of the points I will elaborate below.

Simply put, I believe it would be a good thing if more people thought about the world the way Wordsworth did. This is a very large claim that requires a lot of unpacking, but the takeaway is that Wordsworth’s lifelong activity of making verses evidences a deep, abiding love for humanity, an appreciation of natural beauty and its healing potential, and, not least of all, a conviction that one of the best ways to organize and set forth our ideas for others to read and absorb is in the writing of poems, which are, I suggest, uniquely positioned to encode the values we would wish to share with others. The point of writing like Wordsworth is to think like Wordsworth, and the point of thinking like Wordsworth is to write like Wordsworth. It is my belief that the creation of Wordsworthian memes—that is, units of cultural value—through poetry would, in general, help us to achieve a more sustainable* human world.

*I mean this is the ecological sense of helping to preserve a healthy, habitable planet, but I feel there is a lot that goes into the creation of sustainability that belongs in the purview of other fields (such as literature).

What a Difference 174 Years Can Make

One idea I would like to put forward, which is an idea that I think can be really liberating, is that as poets and writers we aren’t duty-bound not to sound like writers from the more distant past. In fact, if those writers used their writing to make a record of their beliefs, why wouldn’t their style contribute to the form of those beliefs? To someone used to thinking about history from a long-term perspective (generally a good thing, it seems), Wordsworth died “only” 174 years ago (as of this writing). In those 174 years, it might be possible to trace a few developments in human society that have produced some unwanted consequences, such as the industrial revolution that has led indirectly to a climate crisis that now threatens the health of the entire world. Or we might wish now to be in a different system other than capitalism, which Wordsworth encountered in a more prototypical stage (but seems to have still written poetry that either maligns, or manages to ignore, its influence on his contemporaries).

Personally, as a human born in 1987, I have spent most of my life wondering how we can stop the world from ending, how I can avoid becoming some iteration of a factory worker, how I can manage to walk outside without seeing some version of a billboard obscuring the sky. Although Wordsworth didn’t write about these “2024 unique” problems per se, he seemed to see them in mankind’s future anyway:

The world is too much with us; late and soon,

Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers;—

Little we see in Nature that is ours;

We have given our hearts away, a sordid boon!

This Sea that bares her bosom to the moon;

The winds that will be howling at all hours,

And are up-gathered now like sleeping flowers;

For this, for everything, we are out of tune;

It moves us not. Great God! I’d rather be

A Pagan suckled in a creed outworn;

So might I, standing on this pleasant lea,

Have glimpses that would make me less forlorn;

Have sight of Proteus rising from the sea;

Or hear old Triton blow his wreathèd horn.

I love to teach this sonnet by Wordsworth because it expresses something that I see everywhere in the sphere of social media, which is a sense of “how did we get here?” and “why couldn’t I have been born at a different time?”. It isn’t the old and middle-aged (including Gen X or even, I must admit, millennials like me) asking these sorts of questions so much as younger people who are starting to see the world for the big mess that it is. Everywhere I look, I see the creations of people who feel that there is a cultural emptiness pervading many things, and I see, as well, people who are simply wandering through life, too anxious about the state of the world and society to try to do something about it, and similarly convinced that, as individuals who aren’t particularly wealthy, they are powerless to make any meaningful change. All they can do, like Wordsworth, is observe what is happening and question why it is happening at all. But I think by leaving us poetical artifacts such as “The World is Too Much With Us” (i.e. the sonnet above), Wordsworth went one step further than just looking on: he turned his response, a trenchantly critical response, into something memorable, not only because it is beautiful, but because his thoughts and the style of his thoughts are encoded in versification.

The Crux of Things: Versification and Value

When I say that verse encodes values, I mean that poetry has a unique way of making our thoughts and feelings rhythmical. Poetry as verse relies on formal elements that are most typically identified as meter and rhyme. But the real crux of these elements is that they make verses and their constituent lines resemble each other, they encourage repetition, and they combine our ability to evaluate life with our ability to dance—to become rhythmical—in spite of what our evaluative gaze might tell us. It helps to bring in a bit of Coleridge here. Coleridge identified writing verse with a feeling of excitement in the author; this excitement, he claimed, comes from contemplation—from contemplating things long enough that we know that we are saying something true. The reader, by the same token, is excited by reading this verse that we have written, and in that sense the poet “brings the whole soul of man into activity” by involving (or “intervolving”) reason and passion simultaneously.

My idea is that effective verse is effective not because it is well-written or describes something beautiful, but, since it encodes an objectively meaningful value, it is formally beautiful in the sense that it allows the reader to encounter something good carried or encoded in its constituent lines. Thus, “I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud” is beautiful not because it describes clouds or “golden daffodils” but because it describes the speaker’s recollection of these natural objects in a time of crisis—and this form of comfort is an objective human good:

For oft, when on my couch I lie

In vacant or in pensive mood,

They flash upon that inward eye

Which is the bliss of solitude;

And then my heart with pleasure fills,

And dances with the daffodils.

The speaker’s heart “dances with” the images that she perceives in an empty mood of sofa-gazing, becoming alive again to the influences of a hidden world—hidden because the distant daffodils are obscured behind walls and billboards; but also hidden because it is the special province of an “inward eye.” These verses don’t simply depict the value of the hidden and of the open inward eye; they stylize its opening in lines that make us feel as if we are bearing witness to something deeper than the surface of everyday language. They move beyond the imagistic while simultaneously giving rise to the rhythmic feeling at the heart of the speaker’s contemplation.

Conclusion

This brief primer doesn’t do justice to all that I would like to say about poetry, Wordsworth, or the importance of writing, but it at least touches on some of the ideas that I have been mulling over for the last several years, trying to understand why I love poetry and how I can help to make the world a better place. The most obvious objection to teaching poetry as a form of sustainable living is simply that no amount of “beautiful” writing will ever have even the slightest impact on our global need to lower carbon emissions. But of course, such an objection misses the point of writing, which is that it is often shared in a society of people who understand the spirit in which it is meant to be read. Wordsworth wanted the whole world to read his poems, but he always tried them out first on his closest friends and family—his sister Dorothy, his wife Mary, and his close friend and collaborator Samuel Taylor Coleridge. Together they formed a small community with poetry at the center, and it is from the nourishing environment of such a community that Lyrical Ballads and many other great literary works emerged.

Similarly, I conceive “Writing like Wordsworth” to be a teaching project that requires and aspires to the creation of a community of people interested in the transformative power of verse. A community anchored in writing is one that, in our digital age, can transcend time and space, even if it is poetry that is ultimately concerned with the local and particular. Therefore, I invite anyone interested in these ideas to reach out to me by email (adamneikirk@gmail.com) or on social media.

Adam Neikirk

You can follow Adam on Twitter/X here or BlueSky here.

Adam Neikirk is a poet, musician and teacher with research interests in British Romanticism, prosody, and the philosophy of literature. He first encountered the writings of Wordsworth and Coleridge as a child, then forgot about them for a while. Adam received his PhD in Creative Writing in 2023 for a verse biography of Coleridge that he one days hopes to publish. He is the author of three books of poetry, numerous essays on British Romanticism, and is a 2024/2025 BARS Wordsworth Grasmere Fellow.

On This Day: 19th April 1824 – Lord Byron dies in Missolonghi, Greece

      Comments Off on On This Day: 19th April 1824 – Lord Byron dies in Missolonghi, Greece

Byron died far from home, in Missolonghi, Greece, where he played his role (most often as mediator or financier) in the Greek struggle for independence. He did not die in battle, but rather on a bed of sickness after convulsions, a fever, and a programme of bleeding which, of course, weakened rather than revived him.

Portrait by Thomas Phillips, c. 1813 (c) Newstead Abbey; Supplied by The Public Catalogue Foundation

Byron died when he was 36 years old after an eventful life, full, almost to the brim, of words. Thousands of letters and thousands of verses. And yet, in the last months of his life, words slowly, almost imperceptibly left him, until, with his death, his living, active, irrepressible, sometimes infuriating, voice fell into silence.

He continued to speak and write, of course, in those months: letters of business and pleasure, memoranda, reflections on ‘the present state of Greece’. However, his journals cease on February 15th (written February 17th), where he reports that

‘I had a strong shock of a Convulsive description but whether Epileptic – Paralytic – or Apoplectic is not yet decided by the two medical men who attend me.’ [1]

The fit puzzled the doctors and Byron, who stressed it was his first experience of such convulsions and that such attacks did not run in the family. He puzzled through a number of possible causes, including overwork and overexertion, but there is also though a curious reticence, even in the relative privacy of his journals, when he suggests that a primary cause may be the fact that he has been ‘violently agitated with more than one passion recently’. [2] A dangling fragment of revelation.

As was so often the case with Byron, his poetry is more forthcoming about matters of the heart than his prose. It reveals more about the passions so ‘violently agitating’ him. But during his last few months, his poetic output was minimal. Pietro Gamba recounts how Byron presented them all with one of his last poems, ‘On this day I complete my thirty-sixth year’, with the words, ‘You were complaining, the other day, that I never write any poetry now.’ [3]

On this Day I Complete my Thirty-Sixth Year

‘Tis time this heart should be unmoved,

       Since others it hath ceased to move:

Yet though I cannot be beloved,

                                    Still let me love!

   My days are in the yellow leaf;

       The flowers and fruits of Love are gone;

The worm—the canker, and the grief

                                    Are mine alone!

   The fire that on my bosom preys

       Is lone as some Volcanic Isle;

No torch is kindled at its blaze

                                    A funeral pile.

   The hope, the fear, the jealous care,

       The exalted portion of the pain

And power of Love I cannot share,

                                    But wear the chain.

   But ’tis not thus—and ’tis not here

       Such thoughts should shake my Soul, nor now,

Where Glory decks the hero’s bier,

                                    Or binds his brow.

   The Sword, the Banner, and the Field,

       Glory and Greece around us see!

The Spartan borne upon his shield

                                    Was not more free.

   Awake (not Greece—she is awake!)

       Awake, my Spirit! Think through whom

Thy life-blood tracks its parent lake

                                    And then strike home!

   Tread those reviving passions down

       Unworthy Manhood—unto thee

Indifferent should the smile or frown

                                    Of beauty be.

   If thou regret’st thy Youth, why live?

       The land of honourable Death

Is here:—up to the Field, and give

                                    Away thy breath!

   Seek out—less often sought than found—

       A Soldier’s Grave, for thee the best;

Then look around, and choose thy Ground,

                                    And take thy rest.

The poem speaks of an unrequited love, silenced in part by the indifference of the recipient, but also because of who the object of Byron’s passion was – his page, Loukas Chalandritsanos. There is a note of bravado in which he throws this poem at his friends, calling forth commendations from more than one that it is some of his finest poetry, which half reveals what some of them, at least, would most like to have hidden. Much of Byron’s final poetry focuses on this desperate unrequited passion, and is an exercise in revelation and obfuscation, of sound and silence; much is hinted and little said, though the meaning of his lines would be hard to ignore for those familiar with the situation. Such techniques – the removal of names and blurring of specificity, the obscuration of object, the desperate act of self-revelation only half-fulfilled – are found in most of his poetry of queer love and grief, like that found in his ‘Thyrza’ poems. These trace his grief at the death of John Edleston, who he had loved at Cambridge, and use changed pronouns and pseudonyms to suggest a female love interest. The poems reveal and conceal in turn. ‘On my thirty-sixth birthday’ also reveals, half in shadows, a Byron more conflicted and divided than he could publicly admit. A Byron who needs to chivvy himself into the right frame of mind because he is preoccupied by an unrequited desire for a much younger man: ‘Awake (not Greece – she is awake!)/Awake my Spirit!’ A Byron who welcomes death before victory.

Byron’s silence grows more literal in the week leading up to his death, as he suffers increasingly from delirium. In a terrible irony, the great wordsmith, whose verse had enchanted (or enraged) so many, found himself unable to communicate. William Fletcher records some of his last words: mentions of his sister, wife, child, and some of his servants and friends, but Byron’s wishes remain unclear. Slipping in and out of consciousness, no-one can understand what he’s saying. Fletcher’s relates the following exchange:

“Now I have told you all which I hope you will attend to – ” I answered my Lord I am very sorry, but I have not understood one word, which I hope you will now tell me over again – My Lord – in great agitation said, “then if you have not understood me it is now too late.” [4]

Joseph Denis OdevaereLord Byron on his Death-bed (1826)

‘If you have not understood me it is now too late’ offers a broader summary of Byron’s life and end. A man of contradictions, whose words are slippery, whose changing self is revealed in letters and verses which sometimes illuminate and sometimes contradict each other. Conflicted, divided, complex, self-contradictory, elusive. We’ve been arguing about him for centuries. And he remains resolutely uncommunicative. That is, of course, unless you believe Henry Horn’s claims in Strange Visitors (1869) to have contacted Byron through a medium, an encounter through which he gifted us some truly execrable poetry about how he definitely, absolutely didn’t, couldn’t, wouldn’t sleep with his sister.

Byron’s final slip into silence comes after his death. An active silence. An aggressive one. It is not a partial self-concealment or a failure of words. It is a silence that declares itself not only as an absence but as an intrusive presence. A tantalising absence that can promise anything to our imaginations, more, probably, than it could ever have offered. 

His friends, his sister and publisher decide to burn his memoirs. And Byron’s voice dwindles into silence. It has nothing left to say.

We are left with millions of words. Byron’s voice continues to enchant and enrage. It continues to control the narratives of so many of those who lived around him, known to most only through their relation to him. It continues to speak to us across years and miles. 

But it’s just echoes. 

19th April 1824, Byron died and his living, loving, hating, weeping, mocking, roistering, mourning, engaging, seductive, repulsive, provocative, cynical, reactive, evocative, astute, naïve, engaged and engaging voice fell into silence for the last time.

Sam Hirst

Dr Sam Hirst is a post-doctoral Knowledge Exchange Fellow at the University of Nottingham working with Newstead Abbey on the bicentenary of Byron’s death. Their monograph Theology in the Early British and Irish Gothic, 1764 – 1834 was published in 2023 by Anthem Press.

—————————————————————————————————————————-

[1] Byron’s journal, February 15th 2024, collected by Pete Cochran https://petercochran.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/16-greece-1823-18248.pdf

[2] Byron’s journal, February 15th 2024, collected by Pete Cochran https://petercochran.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/16-greece-1823-18248.pdf

[3] Pietro Gamba, A Narrative of Lord Byron’s Last Journey to Greece, first published in Morning Chronicle, October 29, 1824

[4]  William Fletcher to Augusta Leigh, 212 from Missolonghi, April 20th 1824

Call for Volunteer Moderators: BARS PGR/ECR Discord Community

      Comments Off on Call for Volunteer Moderators: BARS PGR/ECR Discord Community

The British Association for Romantic Studies (BARS) would like to invite expressions of interest from those interested in becoming a Volunteer Moderator for the BARS PGR/ECR Discord Community which will be launching soon.  

We are looking for postgraduate or early career researchers, working in or interested in Romanticism and who have experience of using Discord previously, to assist in the moderation of our new BARS PGR/ECR Discord Community. BARS endeavours to support PGR and ECRs as much as possible. We hope that this new community will present an opportunity for fostering peer networks and become a place to ask and answer questions, share ideas, and perhaps even organise social events. We think it would be a great idea to form connections ahead of the BARS ‘Romantic Making and Unmaking’ 2024 Conference taking place this summer in Glasgow and online (and we encourage PGR and ECR attendees to join the BARS Discord Community).

Responsibilities as a Volunteer Moderator will include:

  • Monitor user content to ensure it does not break the BARS Discord server rules;
  • Liaise with members of BARS Executive and Volunteer Moderators;
  • Respond to inquiries from BARS Discord server users;
  • Assist users to access and use the BARS Discord server;
  • Report and deal with complaints from BARS Discord server users;
  • Contribute to the development of the BARS Discord server.

The successful applicants will work closely with members of the BARS Executive, and other PGR/ECR Discord Community Volunteer Moderators.

You will have the chance to contribute directly to the BARS postgraduate community and to develop valuable skills in the field of scholarly communications (communication, group moderation, teamwork, problem solving), which will be useful in academic and non-academic roles alike.

Essential requirements:

  • Postgraduate student or early career researcher
  • Interest in Romanticism.
  • Previous experience of using Discord, either as a member of a community or as a moderator.

To apply: Please send 250 words maximum explaining why you are best placed to undertake the duties above to britishassociationromantic@gmail.com by 17 May 2024. Informal enquiries can be directed to Amy Wilcockson at amy.wilcockson@glasgow.ac.uk

Many thanks to Will Sherwood, PGR at the University of Glasgow, for the idea of a Discord Community.