Featured post

Call for reviewers: BARS Review

The BARS Review is the review journal of the British Association for Romantic Studies, providing timely and comprehensive coverage of new monographs, essay collections, editions and other works dealing with the literature, history… Read more »

BARS Digital Event: TikTok, Short-form Content Creation, and Romantic Research

30th June 2026, 5pm BST
Join meeting: https://uni-mainz-de.zoom.us/j/62337163567?pwd=JCBuA8RmtGHoRmbkLL0ovZFNzaxD2U.1#success
Meeting ID: 623 3716 3567
Passcode: 651977

BARS’s TikTok account provides a platform for sharing tidbits of Romanticism with a wider audience. All of our members are welcome to contribute to the TikTok page to share their expertise, but we understand that short-form video is a confusing format for many people to work in. In this workshop run by the BARS communications team (Amy Wilcockson and Chloe Wilcox), we will provide practical information of how to make TikToks for us, showing you:

  • How TikTok works;
  • How to choose a topic to speak about and tailor it to the time limit;
  • How to film and edit videos.

The workshop will include a breakout session in which you’ll have the opportunity to brainstorm your own video.

We hope that attending will make the prospect of making a TikTok for us less intimidating, and allow us to feature a wider range of expertise on our account (from people like you!). It’ll also help you with other academic and Romantic social media work by getting you familiar with the mysterious but ever-growing world of short-form vertical video.

— Chloe Wilcox

Drama Queens of the Georgian Period: A Tragic-Comic Entertainment, by Sarah Burdett

Dr Sarah Burdett (Cambridge) tells us about her play, ‘Drama Queens of the Georgian Period: A Tragi-Comic Entertainment’. This blog post accompanies a short film, which you can watch on the BARS Youtube channel.

Drama Queens of the Georgian Period: A Tragic-Comic Entertainment.

In April 2026, I was delighted to collaborate with a group of actors to bring to life a play I had devised about women in Georgian theatre. The play, titled ‘Drama Queens of the Georgian Period: A Tragic-Comic Entertainment’, was performed at the Judith E. Wilson Drama Studio, University of Cambridge, as part of the Cambridge Festival. The idea grew out of my ongoing research into the lives and works of forgotten female theatre-makers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (performers, dramatists, stage-managers), whose names have been all but erased from mainstream accounts of Britain’s theatrical past. The play’s action was inspired by, and revolved around, a series of verbatim female-authored / female-performed addresses and epilogues, written between 1750 and 1831, selected to offer non-specialist audiences a glimpse of the challenges faced by women who dared to venture into the male-dominated world of the Georgian playhouse, at a time when women’s proper place was considered to be in the home.

The play, and the addresses that it featured, focalised the following questions:

  • How did women negotiate and justify their right to pursue a professional ambition which demanded a departure from their ‘private’ obligations?
  • To what extent did their visibility in the theatre facilitate women’s capacity to expose, complicate and disrupt the period’s rigid sexual hierarchies and patriarchal biases?
  • What were the public / professional responses to these women?
  • How might their experiences still speak to us today?

Placing centre stage the voices of women not heard in over 200 years, the show provided amusing, surprising and often starkly troubling insight into women’s uniquely gendered experiences of Britain’s historical playhouse, while acknowledging and celebrating the female pioneers who championed women’s right to public and professional careers, paving the way for female theatre-makers of today.

A full cast list from the production (2nd April 2026) is reproduced below, along with copies of the epilogues and addresses featured in the performance, and used in the accompanying film, produced by Andrew Smith at FleetingYearFilms.

I am grateful to have been awarded a Judith E. Wilson Small Grant to fund this event.

For inquiries about the show / the women it features / its relationship to my research, I’m very happy to be contacted at scb93@cam.ac.uk.

Cast and Team

Male Theatre Manager / Male Performer: Manley Gavich
Kitty Clive: Jenny Scudamore
Frances Abington: Eliza Harrison
Sarah Siddons: Eliza Harrison
Sarah Yates: Jenny Scudamore
Eliza Macauley: Eliza Harrison
Madame Eliza Vestris / Narrator: Sarah Burdett
Director and script writer: Sarah Burdett
Lighting: Anna Gungaloo

Epilogues and Addresses

1.‘Epilogue’. From Kitty Clive’s comedy The Rehearsal, or, Bayes in Petticoats (1750), performed at the Drury Lane Theatre, London. Spoken by Kitty Clive. Written by David Garrick. Delivered in film / performance by Jenny Scudamore

David Garrick, manager of the prestigious Drury Lane Theatre, was an ostensible supporter of female playwrights. But this epilogue, spoken by actress, singer and author Kitty Clive, at the close of her comedy The Rehearsal, takes an ironic turn, suggesting that women who write are abandoning their properly feminine duties by neglecting the cares of the home.

A woman write! Hey-day! Cry one and all!
No wonder truly, Bedlam, is too small.
Should this wind circulate and grow a fashion
Each house would be a mad one thro’ the Nation –  
But pray, sirs, why must we not write, nor think?
Have we not heads, and hands, and Pen and Ink?
Can you boast more, that are so wondrous wise?
Have women then no weapons but their eyes?
Were we, like you, to let our Genius loose
We’d top your wit and match you for abuse: …
Have we not proved when ladies please to write 
how much tis ours to profit and Delight? …
In this age, so happy and refined,
What is there not perform’d by womankind?
Unvapoured now, by low domestic cares
And all the plague of family affairs…
From Joy to Joy, from Drum to Drum they roam
And nothing now is unenjoyed – but home –
In wit, in pleasure, we surpass your Spirit –
In what then lies your vast superior merit –
In All our Sex’s Name, Commision’d I,
You Braggadocio Tyrant Men defye;
Name but your Arms, the time and place – we’ll meet you,
Fight us but fair, and on my life we’ll beat you

2. ‘EPILOGUE’. From Frances Sheridan’s comedy The Dupe (1763). Written and spoken by Kitty Clive, who had performed in the play. Delivered in film / performance by Jenny Scudamore

Now able to speak for herself, Clive ridicules the suggestion that women should only ever write for the stage as a last resort, and implies the effortlessness with which they can produce comic verse  

Ladies, methinks I hear you all complain,
Lord! Here’s the talking creature come again!
The men seem frightened, for ’tis on record
A prating female will have the last word.
But you’re all out; for sure as you’re alive,
Not Mrs Friendly now, I’m Mrs. Clive;
No character from fiction will I borrow,
But if you please, I’ll talk again to−morrow.
Then you conclude, from custom long in vogue,
That I come here to speak an Epilogue,
With satyr, humour, spirit, quite refin’d,
Double−entendre too, with wit combin’d, 
Not for the ladies, but to please the men.
All this you guess, and now you’re out again;
For to be brief, our author bid me say
She tried, but cou’dn’t get one to her play.
No Epilogue! why, Ma’am, you’ll spoil your treat,
An Epilogue’s the cordial after meat;
For when the feast is done, without all question,
They’ll want liquors to help them with digestion … 
So beg your friends to write, for faith ’tis hard,
If ‘mongst them all you cannot find one bard.
She took the hint. Will you, good Sir? or you, Sir?
A sister scribbler! sure you can’t refuse her!
… A poet [was asked], but he alleged for reason 
The Muses were so busy at this season,
In penning libels, politics and satyrs,
They had not leisure for such trifling matters.
What’s to be done, she cry’d? Can’t you endeavour
To say some pretty thing? I know you’re clever.
I promis’d, but, unable to succeed,
Beg you’ll accept this rambling deed.

3. ‘Epilogue’. From Elizabeth Craven’s Miniature Picture (1781). Spoken by actress Frances Abington. Written by Joseph Jekyll. Delivered in performance by Eliza Harrison

Frances Abington, actress and subsequent fashion icon, had publicly fallen out with Garrick who defined her as capable only of embodying whimsical and trivial roles becoming of farce. She opposed his ill-treatment of female dramatists and actresses and accused him of ruling with an iron rod.

The men, like tyrants of the vilest kind
Have long our sexes energy confined.
In full dress black, with bows and solemn stalk
Have long monopolised the prologue’s walk.
But still the flippant epilogue was ours,
It asked, for gay support, the female pow’rs 
It asked a flirting girl, coquet and free,
And so, to master it, they fixed on me.

But they mistake my talents – I was born
To tell in sobs and sighs, some tale forlorn
to whet my handkerchief with Juliet’s woes,
Or tune to Shaw’s despair my tragic nose.
Yes, Gentlemen, in education spite,
You still shall find, that we can read, and write
Like you, can swell a Debt or a Debate,
Can quit the table to steer the state.
… Methinks even now I hear my sex’s tongues
The sweet smart melody or female lungs
The storm of Question, the Division calm,
With “hear her! Hear her! Mrs Speaker Ma’am!”
 … Look to the camp! – Coxheath and Warley common[1]
supplied at least for every tent a woman
… Love was the watchword till the morning strife
Roused the tame major and his warring wife.                                                                 

Look to the stage – Tonight’s example draws,
a female dramatist to grace the cause.
Too long your sex has Pegasus bestowed
A neat side saddle is an easier load …
Myself can drive a phaeton, and, let me see
There’s Mrs Astley – she can manage three!…[2]
The men invade our rights – The delicate Elves
They lisp and stutter, like creatures ourselves
Rouge more than we do, simper, flounce and fret
And they coquet. Good God! How they coquet.
They too are coy, and monstrous to relate
Theirs is the coyness in a tete a tete.
… So cease the triumphs of presumpt’ous man! 
And would you ladies but complete my plan
Here should you sign some patriot petition
To mend our constitutional condition.  … 
This fair committee shall detail the rest.
Then let the monsters (if they dare) Protest!

4: ‘Farewell Address’ (1782). Written and spoken by Sarah Siddons. Delivered following her performance in The Distrest Mother. Recited in film / performance by Eliza Harrison

This now famous address was spoken by revered tragedienne Sarah Siddons following her 1782 performance of the eponymous heroine in Ambrose Philip’s The Distrest Mother. The play constituted Siddons’s farewell performance at the Theatre Royal, Bath, ahead of her lucrative move to London’s Drury Lane. Directly contesting the implications of the opening epilogue (from The Rehearsal), Siddons re-models the actress as a devoted mother, showing her professional ambition and her duties to her children to go entirely hand in hand.

Have I not raised some expectation here?
Wrote by herself? What! Authoress and player?
True, we have heard her, thus I guess’d you’d say,
With decency recite another’s lay;
But never heard, nor ever could we dream
Herself had sipp’d the Heliconian stream.
What will she treat of in this same address,
Is it to shew her learning? – Can you guess?
Here let me answer. No; far different views
Possess’d my soul, and fir’d my virgin Muse;
‘Twas honest gratitude, at whose request
Shamed be the heart that will not do its best.
The time draws nigh when I must bid adieu
To this delightful spot, nay, ev’n to you
To you, whose fost’ring kindness rear’d my name,
O’erlooked my faults, but magnified my fame. …

Oh! could kind Fortune, where I next am thrown,
Bestow but half the candour you have shewn.
Envy o’ercome, will hurl her pointless dart,
And critic gall be shed without its smart,
The numerous doubts and fears I entertain,
Be idle all as all possess’d in vain.
But to my promise. If I thus am blessed,
In friendship link’d, beyond my worth caress’d,
Why don’t I here, you’ll say, content remain,
Nor seek uncertainties for certain gain?
What can compensate for the risks you run;
And what your reasons? Surely you have none.
To argue here would but your time abuse:
I keep my word; my reason I produce.

Her three children enter

These are the moles that bear me from your side;
Where I was rooted, where I could have died.
Stand forth, ye elves, and plead your mother’s cause;
Ye little magnets, whose soft influence draws
Me from a point where every gentle breeze,
Wafted my bark to happiness and ease
Sends me adventurous on a larger main,
In hopes that you may profit by my gain.
Have I been hasty? am I then to blame;
Answer, all ye who own a parent’s name.
Thus have I tried you with an untaught Muse,
Who for your favour still most humbly sues,
That you, for classic learning, will receive
My soul’s best wishes, which I freely give
For polished periods round, and touched with art,
The fervent offering of my grateful heart.

4. ‘Occasional Address’. Spoken by Mrs (Sarah) Yates in 1797 at the Haymarket Theatre, London, following her performance in Thomas Francklin’s tragedy The Earl of Warwick, in which she played the heroine, Margaret of Anjou. Delivered in film / performance by Jenny Scudamore

Sarah Yates, aunt-through-marriage of the acclaimed tragic actress, Mary Anne Yates, was unknown in London prior to this performance. The play was staged for her benefit to help provide the finances needed for her to care for her children following her husband’s shocking murder at his home in Pimlico: an event widely reported in the press.

The transient scene of mimic passions past
The far more arduous task’s reserv’d at last – 
Oppress’d with gratitude, permit me here
To breathe the dictates of a heart sincere;
Cheer’d by your kindness, e’en amidst my woes
My soul with renovated transport blows!
Amid these tears, the rays of joy illume
The abyss of grief, and dissipate its gloom.
Each low’ring cloud, with dire Misfortune shed,
And veil’d in Grief, this once devoted head,
By your benignant breath is chac’d away
Like noxious vapours at return of day. – 
Fain would I speak:—alas! these rising tears
Must plead the Orphan’s cause, the Widow’s fears.
To you, the little Innocents appeal,
And lift their trembling hands with grateful zeal:
Robb’d of a parent, ere they knew his worth,
Each pleasing prospect clouded in its birth;
Oh, may their hard and hapless lot attain
Your kind protection: – shall they sue in vain?
Ah no: – for Britons, generous as brave
With rapture fly to succour and to save – 
My grateful heart expands with new delight
Grief and Despair shall wing their devious flight:
Fair Hope, serenely smiling, fills my breast,
And lulls each anxious thought to balmy rest.
’Tis yours, you liberal patrons, yours the praise,
To you, the hymn of Gratitude I raise:
Your genial kindness swells this throbbing heart
With extacy, and blunts Misfortune’s dart.
Blessed with your smiles, I breathe, I live again,
With such protectors, how can I complain?

5: ‘Epilogue’. Written and spoken by Elizabeth Wright Macauley following her one-woman-show, The Regalio, performed at the Town and Anchor Tavern, London, 1818. Delivered in film / performance by Eliza Harrison

Eliza Macauley was ostracised from Britain’s patent theatres after publishing a series of scathing attacks on the exploitative treatment of financially vulnerable actresses (of which she was one) by oppressive male theatre managers. Rather than accepting defeat and relinquishing her professional ambition, Macauley took matters into her hands, writing a series of one-woman-shows which she performed in taverns and minor playhouses across the country. Preceding the solo performances of the actress Fanny Kelly, this was a bold move for a woman, and Macauley’s anxieties around how well audiences would respond to her new initiative is signalled in her epilogue.

Custom exacts, and who denies her sway
An epilogue to every five Act play.
So Coleman writes, but you perhaps may say
Why epilogue for me – mine is no play?
Why that’s most true – not by dramatic rule;
Mine is a mixture we’ll call it the New School. …
But truce to arguments of vain resort
Let’s fall to something of more serious sort:
To me the awful moment is at hand 
To prove if in your favour I can stand –
Alone – unfriended – no protector near
To raise my hopes to dissipate my fear.
Sometime a wanderer on the earth’s wide stage
To gentle gales or to the Tempest’s rage
By turns alas exposed; now raised on high
By partial praises, vaulting to the sky;
Or now again, by envious foes beset;
For foes will rise when envy spreads the net.
… Such are the tempests of theatric life
The Envenom’d Tongue of Discord Breeding strife…
Oh may my Tempest driven bark find here
A peaceful haven safe from every fear!
Let me from you obtain a prosperous name
And be the heralds of my growing fame … 
My humble efforts, then, with kindness view –
My highest pleasure rests in pleasing you.

6. ‘Address’. Spoken by Madame Eliza Vestris in 1831 at the Olympic Theatre following her performance of Penelope in Robert Planche’s Prometheus and Pandora. Written by John Hamilton Reynolds. Delivered in film by Jenny Scudamore

This address was delivered to mark Madame Vestris’s newfound role as manager of the Olympic Theatre, London. Vestris had achieved success as an actress, singer, and stage designer. But, exasperated by her reliance on erratic male theatre managers for the procurement of work and income, she boldly took control of her own playhouse and company.

Noble and gentle – Matrons – patrons – Friends!
Before you here a venturous woman bends!
A warrior woman – that in strife embarks
The first of all dramatic Joan of Arcs.
Cheer on the enterprise, thus dared by me!
The first that ever led a company!
What though, until this very hour and age,
A Lessee-lady never owned a stage!             
I’m that Belle Sauvage – only rather quieter,
Like Mrs Nelson, turned a stage proprietor! …
Humour and wit encourage my intent 
And music means to help me pay my rent.
’Tis not mere promise, I appeal to the facts;
Henceforward judge me only by my acts!
In this, my purpose, stand I not alone –
All women sigh for houses of their own;
And I was weary of perpetual dodging
from house to house in search of board and lodging!
… Oh, my kind friends! Befriend me still as you 
have in the bygone times been wont to do;
…Cheer on my comrades, too, in their career
some of your favourites are around me here …
Still aid the petticoat on old kind principles
and make me yet a Captain of Invincibles. 


[1] Play was staged amidst the backdrop of the American war, at which point military camps were established across Britain, the most famous being Coxheath and Warley. Women accompanied men to the camps to offer support as wives.

[2] Mrs Patty Astley was a circus performer at Astley’s Amphitheatre (run by her husband), renowned for her physical prowess and bodily strength.

BARS Conference 2026: Updates and Updated Programmes

Hello everyone,

We write with a few key updates about BARS 2026.

Registration and Bookings (note deadlines!)

Thank you to those who have already registered for the conference. We’d like to remind everyone that the registration deadline for the in-person conference is Sunday 5th July. (For those attending just the online events, the deadline is Wednesday 5th August.)

We would also like to encourage everyone to consider joining us for the conference dinner, which will take at The Grand Hotel on the evening of Thursday 30th July. The cost of the dinner is £65 and includes complementary drinks and a three-course meal. Sign up via the conference website for what promises to be a fantastic evening.

The conference excursion to Samuel Johnson’s Birthplace Museum at Lichfield on Saturday 1st August is also available for booking via the website at £15.

For all bookings, please see the website here.

Programmes

Thank you to those who have emailed us with notes about the programme and thank you for your patience as we work through these and get back to you. We attach revised versions. One final version of the programme will be published the week before the conference, when any further changes will be addressed.

Unfortunately, the online programme for Thursday 6th August is now full and we are unable to accept any requests to switch from in-person to online presentation.

We are very much looking forward to welcoming you to Birmingham at the end of July.

Andrew, Jessica, and Matthew
BARS 2026 Organising Team

BARS Executive Elections 2026: Call for Nominations – Deadline 8th July

The British Association for Romantic Studies invites self-nominations from members who would like to stand for the role of President or Treasurer.

Both posts have incumbents who have served one term and plan to stand again (Matthew Sangster as President; Mary Fairclough as Treasurer), but other candidates are welcome to nominate themselves for either role. Descriptions of the purviews and responsibilities of both roles can be found below.

The BARS election process follows the provisions of the Constitution, with a three-week nomination window followed by a two-week voting period.

If you would like to stand for election for either of these roles, please send your election statement to Andrew McInnes (bars.secretary@gmail.com) and Yimon Lo (bars.memberships@gmail.com), who will be administering this election on behalf of BARS. Election statements should be addressed to the BARS membership and should describe your vision for the role, your relevant experience and the talents you would bring to the BARS Executive (see here for examples from the 2025 elections). Statements should be received by 11:59 UK Time on Wednesday July 8th. All those standing for election must be members of BARS.

After the deadline, a list of candidates for each role and their statements will be published on the BARS Blog and electronic voting will be opened to the BARS membership.

Any questions regarding the roles or the electoral process can be directed to Andrew and Yimon using the addresses above.


President

The President works with the Executive Committee in overseeing the strategic direction of BARS, new projects and research funding initiatives, future planning, and liaising with external partners. One of the core roles of the President is liaising with the organisers of the Society’s International Conference, ensuring that the needs of BARS Members are met with due diligence. The President chairs regular meetings of the Executive Committee. The President also works with the Executive in identifying and filling any vacancies on the Committee, including elections, appointments and co-options, as appropriate.   

Roles and Responsibilities

  • Act as a voice for Romantic studies both nationally and internationally, advocating for the interests and the wellbeing of BARS Members.
  • Maintain the commitment of BARS to the principles of inclusion, diversity and equality, making the Society a welcoming and safe space for all of its Members.
  • Oversee the strategic business, constitutional and recruitment matters of BARS.
  • Work with the Executive in all aspects of BARS regular business in support of its Membership.
  • Chair the regular Executive Committee meetings (4-5 times/year).
  • Liaise with the organisers of the two major BARS conferences and other regular or one-off events.
  • Ensure that the BARS operating budget remains healthy, balancing need with financial security.
  • Resolve any critical issues or challenges in a timely, transparent and collaborative manner.
  • Develop new partnerships, initiatives and funding sources.

Key Activities 

  • Working with the Vice President and the Past President, plan the strategic aims of BARS and their implementation for the current cycle.
  • Working with the Secretary, coordinate the routine business of BARS.
  • Working with the Treasurer, ensure that the Executive maintains a careful balance between expenditure and income, as well as dealing with any banking issues raised by the Treasurer.
  • Working with the Membership Secretary and PGR/ECR Representatives, review all Members’ needs, requests and feedback.
  • Working with the Communications Officer, ensure that important information is conveyed to the Membership in a timely and effective fashion.
  • Working with the Website Editor, to ensure that outward facing information is appropriate, updated and effective.
  • Working with the BARS Review Editor, ensure that each issue of the BARS Review is published as required.  
  • Working with the Bursaries Officer, review current funding mechanisms, revising them as necessary and implementing new schemes that support BARS values.
  • Working with the Research and Innovation Officer, review the state of the field, the relationship of Romantic studies to institutional and governmental agendas, and ensure a responsive approach to the challenges facing our discipline.
  • Oversee the recruitment of new members of the Executive and associated Officers.
  • Provide mentoring and continuing professional support to fellow members of the Executive if they desire it.
  • Prepare and oversee the selection of the BARS International Conference, including paying a site visit to the selected host and liaising with the conference organising team. 
  • Working with the Digital Events team to ensure that BARS is represented fairly, engagingly and equitably in the programme of activities.
  • Working with the relevant Committee members (e.g. the Outreach and Impact, International, Non-Academic and Schools Officers) and other partners, oversee new strategic partnerships and outreach activities.
  • Oversee the appointment of the Book Prize Chair, and receive regular updates from the Chair once appointed.
  • Attend to any constitutional and practical issues relevant to BARS and its Members.

Treasurer

The Treasurer oversees all aspects of the Association’s financial management, working closely with other members of the Executive Committee to develop͕ maintain and safeguard the Association’s finances. While the Treasurer ensures that these responsibilities are met, work can be delegated as appropriate to the Bursaries Officer, the Membership Secretary and ad hoc sub-committees (e.g. for conferences and other events, projects or partnerships).

Roles and Responsibilities

  • Oversee general finances of the Society.
  • Oversee financial planning, budgeting and fundraising.
  • Manage the Society’s bank account and financial records͘.
  • Control any of the Society’s assets, stock and sources of income͘.

Key Activities

  • Oversee and present budgets, accounts and financial statements to the Executive Committee and Members of the Society.
  • Liaise with designated members of the Committee and ad hoc partners (e.g. conference organisers) about financial matters.
  • Ensure that appropriate and robust financial systems and controls are in place.
  • Ensure that record-keeping and accounts meet statutory or best-practice expectations.
  • Liaise with the Membership Secretary in processing Members’ dues, including shared oversight of the Society’s PayPal account.
  • Liaise with the Bursaries Officer in the disbursement of any funding for Fellowships.
  • Disburse non-Fellowship claims that have been approved by the Executive Committee.
  • Disburse any other moneys that have been approved for expenditure by the President and/or Executive Committee.
  • Advise on the Society’s fundraising strategies͘.
  • Ensure use of funds complies with conditions set by relevant legislation, financial control systems and organisational bodies.
  • Prepare and present budgets for new and ongoing projects.
  • Prepare and present regular reports on the Society’s financial position (e͘g͘ at the Executive Committee meetings͕ at the Society’s Biennial General Meetings).
  • Manage bank and other financial accounts.
  • Set up appropriate systems for book-keeping, payments, lodgements and cash disbursements.
  • Ensure everyone handling money keeps proper records and documentation.

BARS/BAVS Nineteenth-Century Matters Fellowship 2026 Awardee Announced

Nineteenth-Century Matters is an initiative jointly run by the British Association for Romantic Studies and the British Association for Victorian Studies. Now in its tenth year, it is aimed at postdoctoral researchers who have completed their PhD, but who are not currently employed in a full-time academic post. Nineteenth-Century Matters offers unaffiliated early career researchers a platform from which to pursue their research, while also organising an academic event on a theme related to nineteenth-century studies or a workshop focused on an aspect of professionalisation.

BARS and BAVS are thrilled to announce that the Nineteenth-Century Matters Fellowship 2026 has been awarded to Dr Charlotte Wilson. Charlotte will receive mentorship from Dr Clare Horrocks and Dr Jamie Whitehead at Liverpool John Moores University.

Charlotte Wilson has recently completed her PhD in English Literature at the University of Oxford examining the representation of domestic caregivers in nineteenth-century medical literature and fictional novels. Her research considers how ideas about home caregiving were shaped in the medical and cultural imagination, drawing attention to the caregiver as an important agent in medical treatment and exploring how print culture wrestles with the pleasures and challenges of caregiving relationships. Charlotte’s broader research interests include the histories of domesticity and the family, disability studies, and the medical humanities.

For more information about this scheme and other funding opportunities, please visit our website: www.bars.ac.uk.

Dr Cleo O’Callaghan Yeoman
BARS Early Career Officer
12/06/26

Stephen Copley Research Awards 2026 (Round One): Awardees Announced

The BARS Executive Committee established the Stephen Copley bursary scheme in order to support postgraduate and early-career research within the UK. The bursaries primarily fund expenses incurred through travel to libraries and archives necessary for the applicant’s research, alongside other research-focused costs, such as (but not limited to) photocopying, scanning, and childcare. Please do join us in congratulating the very worthy winners and their projects:

Megan D Bennett (Sheffield) – ‘Those of Quality, Those of the Vulgar: Alcohol and Class in British Art and Literature 1747–1837’

Elena Bonacini (Cambridge) – ‘Anna Tonelli: Art, Mobility, and Exchange between Italy, Britain, and India, 1763–1846’

Katie MacLean (Stirling) – ‘Jane Austen and Fantasy’

Rachel Xhemajli (Oxford) – ‘The British Evangelical Novel and Its Sociopolitical Reception in the Early American Republic’

Once they have completed their research projects, each winner will write a brief report. These reports will be published on the BARS Blog and circulated through our social media. For more information about the bursaries, including reports from past winners, please visit our website: www.bars.ac.uk.

Dr Gerard McKeever
Bursaries Officer, BARS
12/6/26

Call for Papers: Ann Radcliffe, Then and Now Conference

The CFP for the Ann Radcliffe, Then and Now conference is now live – please submit proposals for 20 minute papers by clicking here. AHRC-funded bursaries are available for unwaged, undergraduate, postgraduate, and ECR participants (see below).Please direct all queries to annradcliffeconference@sheffield.ac.ukThe Ann Radcliffe, Then and Now team are delighted to welcome you to Sheffield for our international Radcliffe conference. In addition to papers and keynote lectures from world-leading experts, expect a range of exciting events which we’ll be unveiling month by month from July! Please keep an eye on our website and social media pages to stay up to date – and click here to submit your paper proposal.

WHEN? 24th-26th June, 2027

WHERE? INOX, Level 5, Students’ Union Building, Durham Road, Sheffield, S10 2TG

KEYNOTE SPEAKERS: Tom DuggettMichael GamerRobert MilesKatrina O’LoughlinDale Townshend, and Angela Wright

CONFERENCE FEE: £180 (£120 for unwaged, undergraduate, postgraduate, and ECR participants; £60 for online-only audience members).

CALL FOR PAPERS

Deadline 15th September (we will aim to get back to you by 30th September)

A pioneer of Gothic fiction, poetry, and travel writing, Ann Radcliffe (1764-1823) was one of the most influential and widely read authors of her day. Her published works dominated the Romantic literary landscape, anticipating later psychological fiction and inspiring writers from Byron to the Brontës, from Mary Wollstonecraft to Mary Shelley. But Radcliffe’s influence extended far beyond her Romantic and Victorian successors: her unique and innovative Gothic mode impacts upon the way we understand and experience art, media, and literature today. Since 2024, the Ann Radcliffe, Then and Now project, funded by the AHRC, has sought to reintroduce Ann Radcliffe to 21st-century readers by exploring both her contemporary influence and her lasting legacies. To celebrate the project and the accompanying Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ann Radcliffe, we invite you to our conference, held at The University of Sheffield: an opportunity for Radcliffe readers and scholars to come together and celebrate her incredible and lasting contribution to literature.

We welcome paper proposals on any and all aspects of Radcliffe’s life and writing. Topics can include, but are not limited to, Radcliffe’s

~ novels and poetry

~ literary influences

~ imitators and emulators 

~ contemporary reception and adaptation

~ Gothic mode

~ Gothic and Romantic contemporaries

~ Travel and Travel Imaginary

~ Preternatural, Supernatural, Nature, the Numinous

~ Circulating Objects

~ Publishing Networks

~ Form and style

~ Aesthetics

~ Political commitments

~ 21st-century reception, revival, and adaptation

Click here to submit your paper proposals. Deadline: 15.09.26.

We are very pleased to announce that we are able to offer AHRC-funded bursaries to undergraduate, PGR, ECR, and unwaged participants: x4 £500 bursaries for UK participants and x2 £1000 bursaries for overseas participants. These bursaries are designed to cover the conference fee, accommodation, and travel. If you would like to apply for a bursary, please provide the relevant information as outlined on the Google Form, and feel free to get in touch at annradcliffeconference@sheffield.ac.uk with any questions.

Please note that the conference will be hybrid for audience members, but if you are giving a paper you must attend in-person.

BARS Stephen Copley Research Award Report: Flora Lisica on Byron’s Papers at the National Library of Scotland

The National Library of Scotland in Edinburgh holds the largest collection of Byron’s papers as part of the John Murray Archive. It was a wonderful joy to be able to study these materials thanks to BARS’s Stephen Copley Research Award.

Born in London, Byron’s mother was Scottish, and he spent a large portion of his childhood in Aberdeen. He moved to England in 1798 when, aged ten, he inherited Newstead Abbey in Nottinghamshire, and became Baron Byron of Rochdale upon the death of his great-uncle. Though Byron never returned to Scotland in his lifetime, it is therefore nonetheless somewhat fitting that many of the physical remnants of his literary legacy have since 2006 been held not too far from where he spent his early years.

Travelling from London to Edinburgh by train, I thought about the way that some of my journey was, in inverse, loosely retracing Byron’s journey from Aberdeen to Newstead. Together with his mother and one servant, Byron departed from Aberdeen in August 1798, crossing the Firth of Forth, and then likely going through Edinburgh and taking the Great North Road towards Nottinghamshire. The voyage was evidently memorable for him: in 1820 he noted that remembering Loch Laven made him feel ‘as it were but yesterday’ that he was there.

View of North Sea near Berwick-upon-Tweed.

My train took me along the east coast, and it occurred to me that some of the endless views of the North Sea which were slipping past my train window might have also been what ten-year-old Byron would have marvelled at as they slid past the windows of his coach. Later, when sitting in the Special Collections Reading Room at the National Library of Scotland’s George IV Bridge building, which lets one’s eye expand above Edinburgh’s rooftops and towards Arthur’s Seat, I also wondered what Byron might have seen of Edinburgh when passing through.

View from the Special Collections Reading Room at the National Library of Scotland’s George IV Bridge building.

Being able to access the materials in the John Murray Archive thanks to the Stephen Copley Research Award made it possible for me to advance my research in two areas partaking to Byron. My overall area of interest is tragedy in the Romantic period, and being able to see manuscripts partaking to some of Byron’s plays such as Manfred (1816) and Werner (1815, pub. 1822), and also some of the ways in which he writes about his tragedies in his letters to his publisher, John Murray II, was incredible. Further, I am interested in ways in which Romantic writers’ interest in tragedy seeps into the ways in which they write about themselves and the events in their own lives, blending fictional and personal drama. Byron’s letters and journals are rich in such instances, and it was wonderfully exciting to be able to trace this in the materials held as part of the Murray Archive, which includes Byron’s correspondences with his close friends and family, including his sister Augusta Leigh, and friends John Cam Hobhouse and Douglas Kinnaird.

Byron’s letters to John Murray (MS.4349).

Byron’s letters to John Cam Hobhouse (MS.43439).

Before I came to the archive, I hoped that looking at Byron’s manuscripts would mean I encountered things I wasn’t able to see by reading printed versions. Discrepancies between what he wrote initially and what was eventually printed, maybe; a crossed-out word, an alternate line. Perhaps a sentence which I had not previously come across because it had been discarded in the final version, or maybe an eloquent flurry of punctuation which the regularity of print could not fully convey. In other words, something which might help me understand his texts better, affirm how I was approaching them, or enable me to see them differently. Wonderfully, I had some thrilling encounters of precisely this kind. A crossed-out line in the draft of Hints from Horace (1811, pub. 1831) confirmed my reading of a particular section which I keep returning to, for example; the way the stage directions appear in the manuscript of Manfred developed my sense of Byron’s thinking about stageing, and so on.

Bound manuscripts of Hints from Horace (MS.4334) and Manfred (MS.4335).

But equally exciting was the way that handling these items has made me begin looking differently at Byron’s work, and my work on his work, in the first place. What I was especially struck by was how Byron’s papers show the development of his thoughts not as fixed ideas, but as a process of an idea taking shape, emerging from the disarray of that process. Some printed editions of Byron’s work gesture towards this, and indeed he himself made use of this in the ways that he chose to present some of his poetry. One such case is The Giaour (1813-15), where every new edition came with new additions, so that the final edition was nearly twice the length of the first one.

Handling Byron’s manuscripts brought the significance of that messy, uncertain, process to the foreground for me. They quiver all over with the dartings of instinct and afterthought, the pull of sound and sense and feeling, and with the careful workings of revision. My favourite moments in the Special Collections Reading Room were when I could see the imprint of Byron thinking and feeling on the page. A word in a draft crossed out, replaced, crossed out again, replaced again, such as in the messy little scraps which formed the additions to later editions of The Giaour, for example. There, one can see Byron stacking word upon word, image upon image, working out the chain of associations and the order of telling and emphasis.

Or a letter which commences in a neat, composed hand, which then becomes increasingly windswept with emotion as the letter progresses, the final lines only really legible through a mixture of inference and guesswork. I was finding myself fascinated by things I would never think to even consider if reading printed versions. How wide are the margins, how much space is there between each word, how level or slanting are the lines, are there dashes or deletions or underlining or insertions, are there squiggles or other kinds of markings? Is the paper thin and flimsy and translucent, or is it sturdy, with the edges dipped in gold; does the ink shimmer; what colour is the wax of the seal? As one attempts to decipher Byron’s sometimes tricky hand, the significance of all these physical and visual markers in gauging his purposes comes to the surface.

Byron’s letters to his sister Augusta Leigh (MS.43479).

Handling Byron’s papers, I inevitably wondered where he might have sat as he wrote this or that, whether it was morning or night-time by candlelight, whether he was alone or in company, whether he was eating or drinking something (what?) which might have caused that faint stain on a page. I’m sure we all think about these kinds of things sometimes, though such aimless conjecture can feel frivolously peripheral to academic study. But I am grateful to the Stephen Copley Research Award for providing me with the opportunity to be reminded that this kind of work of the imagination is also important. I have to let the writing touch my imagination in order to be able to listen to it closely. Sitting in the Special Collections Reading Room, holding the sheets of paper which Byron once held, and finding these beautiful moments of almost-intimacy as I let the twists and turns of his pen guide my understanding: this, I was reminded, is also a version of the same imaginative intimacy which I always hope to reach when I read.

I am grateful to the National Library of Scotland for enabling me to access these materials, and for permitting photographs taken in archive to be shared here.

Flora Lisica is Assistant Professor in English at Northeastern University London. She completed her PhD on Romantic Literature at the University of Cambridge. and has published on Byron, Keats and Mary Shelley. She is working on a monograph about tragedy in the Romantic period. 

Call for applications: HistoryLab+ and HistoryUK ECR Survey Fellow

HistoryLab+ and HistoryUK have together developed a UK-wide survey of the support and access to resources available to historical researchers post-PhD. 

HistoryLab+ is the UK’s national network for early career historians (ECHs). It is open to people (a) approaching the end of their doctorate in History (or a related subject) or (b) with a doctorate in History (or a related subject), in the early stages of their career in any sector. The committee works with the network’s parent institution, the Institute of Historical Research (IHR), with learned societies, and with professionals across the education, GLAM, media, and other sectors to provide members with tailored support, including

  • career development training, 
  • networking opportunities, 
  • resources, 
  • and a programme of events showcasing recent historical research and projects in a wide variety of specialisms.

HistoryUK is the independent national body promoting and monitoring the discipline of History in the UK’s higher education sector. It is funded by History departments or their equivalents and campaigns on issues of concern to academic historians and the broader history community, particularly in the following areas: 

  • the profile of History in higher education and beyond
  • the state of the profession, particularly the recruitment and career development of undergraduates, postgraduates, researchers and staff
  • research culture, including the research resources available to historians and the impact of the Research Excellence Framework
  • teaching and learning within the discipline, especially the impact of the National Student Survey and Teaching Excellence Framework
  • audit culture, to ensure that the demands of external audit and quality measurement are appropriate to the discipline and light in touch

HistoryLab+ is seeking an early career historian to do the following:

  • review and refine the survey 
  • guide it through the School of Advanced Study’s ethical review process,
  • co-ordinate its dissemination to ECHs and teaching staff in higher education departments, 
  • ensure GDPR compliance and otherwise manage the data (in co-ordination with members of the HistoryLab+ committee), 
  • analyse the data 
  • and produce a report suitable for web publication

This project is expected to start in July 2026 and to be completed within the 2026-27 academic year. 

The successful applicant will be paid an honorarium totalling £800, in two instalments, and will be named as principal author of the resulting web publication. 

The deadline for applications is 14 June at 23:59. 

Eligibility

Any person either (a) approaching the end of their doctorate in History (or a related subject) or (b) with a doctorate in History (or a related subject) and in the early stages of their career in any sector. A ‘related subject’ can be any Humanities subject, providing that your doctoral research does or did involve mainly historical research, as opposed to the study of contemporary incidents and other phenomena. 

How to apply

Please submit the following to historylabplus.ihr@gmail.com by 14 June at 23:59:

  • a one-page document outlining the training, work experiences, and skills that make you suitable for this role
  • a two-page CV
  • contact details for one referee who may be contacted if you are shortlisted 
  • your availability for a short online interview in the w/c 15 June if you are shortlisted

If you have any questions at all, please direct these to historylabplus.ihr@gmail.com and treasurer.historylabplus@gmail.com

—————-

Sarah Wride

Call for Expressions of Interest: Virtual Reading of Joanna Baillie’s The Family Legend

Staging Baillie in a Digital Age: Virtual Reading of The Family Legend 

On Saturday 21st November 2026, as part of the ‘Joanna Baillie Project’ initiated and facilitated by Chris Bundock (University of Essex), we will be hosting a virtual reading of Joanna Baillie’s The Family Legend. The reading, accompanied by a closing discussion, is open to international participation and is approximated to run from 6.30-9pm UK time. At this stage, we are inviting anyone interested in contributing to this event, either as audience member, reader, or creative participant, to contact us (see below). 

Joanna Baillie’s ‘Highland play’, The Family Legend, was performed at the Edinburgh Theatre Royal in 1810. The play centres on two warring Scottish clans, the Macleans and the Campbells, and provides an early example of the Scottish ‘National Drama’, exploring themes of identity, vengeance, and the politics of peace. This was the first of Baillie’s plays to be performed in her native Scotland. While her earlier tragedy De Montfort (1798) had been staged at a large London playhouse – the prestigious Drury Lane – Baillie had no intention of allowing her Legend to suffer this same fate. She informed her friend, and the play’s dedicatee, Walter Scott, in a letter of 1810, that the play was better suited to Edinburgh’s ‘little theatre’ not only on account of its national theme, but because ‘Large Theatres are a bane & pest to the Drama’ (Slagle, Collected Letters, 1999). As Catherine Burroughs identifies, Baillie called overtly in her third volume of A Series of Plays – now more commonly known as the Plays On the Passions – for a ‘smaller stage’ than that popularised in London, ‘to permit subtler dramatization of both public and private realms’, and to enable ‘a more emotionally expressive, less exaggerated acting style’ (Closet Stages, 1997, 87). The expansive London playhouses, Baillie considered, sacrificed emotional minutia for extravagant spectacle, and were therefore inimical to the dramatic project outlined in her ‘Introductory Discourse’ to Plays On the Passions, which informed her dramatic corpus at large.  

Following the successful revival (directed by Robert Price) of Joanna Baillie’s The Tryal (1798) at the Bury St Edmunds Theatre in 2024, we are keen to experiment further with the performability of Baillie’s plays in a twenty-first-century context: this time, assessing the relationship between Baillie’s theory of the drama and the innovative practices facilitated by the digital age. Baillie’s animosity to large stages limited the theatrical reach of The Family Legend to a select, regional audience, confining the tropes and motifs of the nascent ‘National Drama’ to the country of its birth, and contributing to Baillie’s long-held reputation as a closet dramatist. Our virtual reading of The Family Legend, performed via an online platform, will grant Baillie’s ‘Highland Play’ a global audience not confined to the number of seats in a particular playhouse, while taking seriously her call for a theatrical backdrop which complements the dramatic design laid out in her ‘Introductory Discourse’: especially, her emphasis on emotional nuance and the cultivation of an intimate connection between character and spectator.  It will do so by experimenting with the synthesis of Baillie’s dramatic philosophy with the visual, aural and spatial opportunities afforded by online technologies. 

For further information, or to make your interest known, please contact the event organisers, Sarah Burdett (scb93@cam.ac.uk) and Diane Piccitto (diane.piccitto@msvu.ca) by 30th July 2026

Sarah Burdett